The production of Upsilon(1S), Upsilon(2S) and Upsilon(3S) mesons in protonproton collisions at the centreofmass energy of sqrt(s)=7 TeV is studied with the LHCb detector. The analysis is based on a data sample of 25 pb1 collected at the Large Hadron Collider. The Upsilon mesons are reconstructed in the decay mode Upsilon > mu+ mu and the signal yields are extracted from a fit to the mu+ mu invariant mass distributions. The differential production crosssections times dimuon branching fractions are measured as a function of the Upsilon transverse momentum pT and rapidity y, over the range pT < 15 GeV/c and 2.0 < y < 4.5. The crosssections times branching fractions, integrated over these kinematic ranges, are measured to be sigma(pp > Upsilon(1S) X) x B(Upsilon(1S)>mu+ mu) = 2.29 {\pm} 0.01 {\pm} 0.10 0.37 +0.19 nb, sigma(pp > Upsilon(2S) X) x B(Upsilon(2S)>mu+ mu) = 0.562 {\pm} 0.007 {\pm} 0.023 0.092 +0.048 nb, sigma(pp > Upsilon(3S) X) x B(Upsilon(3S)>mu+ mu) = 0.283 {\pm} 0.005 {\pm} 0.012 0.048 +0.025 nb, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic and the third is due to the unknown polarisation of the three Upsilon states.
Invariant mass distribution of the selected $\varUpsilon\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^$ candidates in the range $ p_{\rm T} <15 {\mathrm{\,Ge V\!/}c} $ and $2.0<y<4.5$. The three peaks correspond to the $\varUpsilon(1S)$, $\varUpsilon(2S)$ and $\varUpsilon(3S)$ signals (from left to right). The superimposed curves are the result of the fit as described in the text. 
fig1.eps [112 KiB] HiDef png [197 KiB] Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file 

Total efficiency $\varepsilon$ of the $\varUpsilon(1S)$ as a function of (a) the $\varUpsilon(1S)$ transverse momentum and (b) rapidity, estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation, for three different $\varUpsilon(1S)$ polarisation scenarios, indicated by the parameter $\alpha$ described in the text. 
fig2a.eps [13 KiB] HiDef png [158 KiB] Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file 

fig2b.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [131 KiB] Thumbnail [60 KiB] *.C file 

Double differential ${\varUpsilon\rightarrow \mu^+\mu^}$ crosssections times dimuon branching fractions as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ in bins of rapidity for (a) the $\varUpsilon(1S)$, (b) the $\varUpsilon(2S)$ and (c) the $\varUpsilon(3S)$. The error bars correspond to the total uncertainty for each bin. 
fig3a.eps [23 KiB] HiDef png [253 KiB] Thumbnail [95 KiB] *.C file 

fig3b.eps [22 KiB] HiDef png [242 KiB] Thumbnail [92 KiB] *.C file 

fig3c.eps [22 KiB] HiDef png [245 KiB] Thumbnail [92 KiB] *.C file 

Differential $\varUpsilon(1S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ production crosssection times dimuon branching fraction as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ integrated over $y$ in the range 2.04.5, compared with the predictions from (a) the NNLO* CSM [29] for direct production, and (b) the NLO NRQCD [31] and CEM [14]. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties for each bin, while the bands indicate the uncertainty on the theory prediction. 
fig4a.eps [19 KiB] HiDef png [938 KiB] Thumbnail [109 KiB] *.C file 

fig4b.eps [18 KiB] HiDef png [544 KiB] Thumbnail [94 KiB] *.C file 

Differential (a) $\varUpsilon(2S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ and (b) $\varUpsilon(3S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ production crosssections times dimuon branching fractions as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ integrated over $y$ in the range 2.04.5, compared with the predictions from the NNLO* CSM for direct production [29]. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties for each bin, while the bands indicate the uncertainty on the theory prediction. 
fig5a.eps [18 KiB] HiDef png [955 KiB] Thumbnail [109 KiB] *.C file 

fig5b.eps [18 KiB] HiDef png [948 KiB] Thumbnail [107 KiB] *.C file 

Differential crosssections of $\varUpsilon(1S),\varUpsilon(2S)$ and $\varUpsilon(3S)$ times dimuon branching fractions as a function of (a) $ p_{\rm T} $ integrated over $y$ and (b) $y$ integrated over $ p_{\rm T} $. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties for each bin. 
fig6a.eps [16 KiB] HiDef png [174 KiB] Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file 

fig6b.eps [13 KiB] HiDef png [146 KiB] Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file 

Ratios of $\varUpsilon(2S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ and $\varUpsilon(3S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ with respect to $\varUpsilon(1S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ as a function of $ p_{\rm T} $ of the $\varUpsilon$ in the range $2.0<y<4.5$, assuming no polarisation. The error bars on the data correspond to the total uncertainties for each bin except for that due to the unknown polarisation, which ranges between 15% and 26% as listed in Table 5. 
fig7.eps [12 KiB] HiDef png [150 KiB] Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file 

Animated gif made out of all figures. 
PAPER2011036.gif Thumbnail 
Summary of the relative systematic uncertainties on the crosssection measurements. Ranges indicate variations depending on the ($ p_{\rm T} ,y$) bin and the $\varUpsilon$ state. All uncertainties are fully correlated among the bins. 
Table_1.pdf [34 KiB] HiDef png [106 KiB] Thumbnail [17 KiB] tex code 

Double differential crosssection $\varUpsilon(1S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ as a function of rapidity and transverse momentum, in pb/( $ {\mathrm{\,Ge V\!/}c}$ ). The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is due to the unknown polarisation of the $\varUpsilon(1S)$. 
Table_2.pdf [67 KiB] HiDef png [177 KiB] Thumbnail [27 KiB] tex code 

Double differential crosssection $\varUpsilon(2S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ as a function of rapidity and transverse momentum, in pb/( $ {\mathrm{\,Ge V\!/}c}$ ). The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is due to the unknown polarisation of the $\varUpsilon(2S)$. Regions where the number of events was not sufficient to perform a measurement are indicated with a dash. 
Table_3.pdf [67 KiB] HiDef png [161 KiB] Thumbnail [27 KiB] tex code 

Double differential crosssection $\varUpsilon(3S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ as a function of rapidity and transverse momentum, in pb/( $ {\mathrm{\,Ge V\!/}c}$ ). The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is due to the unknown polarisation of the $\varUpsilon(3S)$. Regions where the number of events was not sufficient to perform a measurement are indicated with a dash. 
Table_4.pdf [66 KiB] HiDef png [159 KiB] Thumbnail [27 KiB] tex code 

Ratios of crosssections $\varUpsilon(2S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ and $\varUpsilon(3S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$ with respect to {$\varUpsilon(1S)\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^$} as a function of $ p_{\rm T} $ in the range $2.0<y<4.5$, assuming no polarisation. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is due to the unknown polarisation of the three states. 
Table_5.pdf [56 KiB] HiDef png [148 KiB] Thumbnail [24 KiB] tex code 
Created on 19 April 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 25 April 2019.