An angular analysis of the decay $B_s^0 \rightarrow K^{*0}\bar{K}{}^{*0}$ is performed using $pp$ collisions corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $1.0$ ${fb}^{1}$ collected by the LHCb experiment at a centreofmass energy $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV. A combined angular and mass analysis separates six helicity amplitudes and allows the measurement of the longitudinal polarisation fraction $f_L = 0.201 \pm 0.057 {(stat.)} \pm 0.040{(syst.)}$ for the $B_s^0 \rightarrow K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}{}^*(892)^0$ decay. A large scalar contribution from the $K^{*}_{0}(1430)$ and $K^{*}_{0}(800)$ resonances is found, allowing the determination of additional $CP$ asymmetries. Triple product and direct $CP$ asymmetries are determined to be compatible with the Standard Model expectations. The branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(B_s^0 \rightarrow K^*(892)^0 \bar{K}{}^*(892)^0)$ is measured to be $(10.8 \pm 2.1 {\ \rm (stat.)} \pm 1.4 {\ \rm (syst.)} \pm 0.6 \ (f_d/f_s) ) \times 10^{6}$.
Definition of the angles involved in the analysis of $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow K ^{*0} \overline{ K }{} {}^{*0} $ decays. 
Fig1.pdf [8 KiB] HiDef png [104 KiB] Thumbnail [42 KiB] *.C file 

Invariant mass distribution for selected $K^+\pi^ K^ \pi^+$ candidates. The (blue) solid line is the result of the fit explained in the text. The $ B ^0_ s $ and $ B ^0$ signal peaks are shown as as dasheddotted lines (pink and dark green, respectively). The various peaking background components are represented as dotted lines: (red) $ B ^0 \rightarrow \phi K ^{*0} $ , (green) $\Lambda^0_b \rightarrow p\pi^ K^ \pi^+$ and (light blue) partially reconstructed decays. The (grey) dotted line is the combinatorial background component. The normalised residual (pull) is shown below. 
Fig2.pdf [25 KiB] HiDef png [283 KiB] Thumbnail [74 KiB] *.C file 

Results of the simultaneous fit to $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow K^+\pi^K^\pi^+$ candidates (blue solid line) in the three helicity angles. The dots represent the data after background subtraction and acceptance correction. The red dashed line is the {Pwave} component, the green dashed line is the {Swave} component and the lightblue dashed line represents the $\mathcal{A}^+_s \mathcal{A}_0$ interference term. 
Fig3a.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [175 KiB] Thumbnail [60 KiB] *.C file 

Fig3b.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [175 KiB] Thumbnail [59 KiB] *.C file 

Fig3c.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [188 KiB] Thumbnail [61 KiB] *.C file 

Projections of the model fitted to $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow K^+\pi^K^\pi^+$ candidates (blue solid line) in the (top) invariant mass of $K\pi$ pairs and (bottom) $\cos\theta$ asymmetries as functions of $K\pi$ mass ($m_1$, $m_2$). The dots represent the data after background subtraction and acceptance correction. The red dashed line is the {Pwave} component, the green dashed line is the {Swave} component and the lightblue dashed line represents the ${A}^+_s {A}_0$ interference term. 
Fig4a.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [232 KiB] Thumbnail [74 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4b.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [232 KiB] Thumbnail [74 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4c.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [169 KiB] Thumbnail [57 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4d.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [171 KiB] Thumbnail [57 KiB] *.C file 

(Left) Profile likelihood for the parameter $f_L$. (Right) Regions corresponding to $\Delta\ln\mathcal{L} =$ 0.5, 2 and 4.5 (39%, 87% and 99% confidence level) in the $A_s^^2$  $f_L$ plane. 
Fig5a.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [107 KiB] Thumbnail [35 KiB] *.C file 

Fig5b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [166 KiB] Thumbnail [60 KiB] *.C file 

Invariant mass of the selected $K^+K^K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp}$ combinations and result of the fit to the data. The points represent the data and the (blue) solid line is the fit model. The $ B ^0_ s $ and $ B ^0$ signal peaks are shown as as dasheddotted lines (pink and dark green, respectively). The contribution from partially reconstructed decays is represented as a (light blue) dashed line. The (grey) dotted line is the combinatorial background component. The normalised residual (pull) is shown below. 
Fig6.pdf [21 KiB] HiDef png [269 KiB] Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file 

Animated gif made out of all figures. 
PAPER2014068.gif Thumbnail 
Untagged timeintegrated terms used in the analysis, under the assumption of no $ C\!P$ violation. 
Table_1.pdf [79 KiB] HiDef png [242 KiB] Thumbnail [38 KiB] tex code 

Parameters of the mass propagators used in the fit. 
Table_2.pdf [51 KiB] HiDef png [82 KiB] Thumbnail [15 KiB] tex code 

Triple product and direct $ C\!P$ asymmetries measured in this analysis. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. 
Table_3.pdf [43 KiB] HiDef png [148 KiB] Thumbnail [23 KiB] tex code 

Results of the simultaneous fit to $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow K^+\pi^K^\pi^+$ TOS and nonTOS candidates with $M(K^+, \pi^, K^, \pi^+)  m_{ B ^0_ s } < 30 {\mathrm{\,MeV\!/}c^2} $ (phases are measured in radians). The first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. 
Table_4.pdf [50 KiB] HiDef png [175 KiB] Thumbnail [28 KiB] tex code 

Systematic uncertainties in the measurement of the magnitude and phase of the different amplitudes contributing to the $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow K^+\pi^K^\pi^+$ decay. 
Table_5.pdf [52 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [18 KiB] tex code 

Summary of relevant quantities in the $ {\cal B}( B ^0_ s \rightarrow K ^{*0} \overline{ K }{} {}^{*0} )$ calculation. The factor $\kappa( B ^0_ s \rightarrow K ^{*0} \overline{ K }{} {}^{*0} )$ is defined as $\lambda_{f_L}( B ^0_ s \rightarrow K ^{*0} \overline{ K }{} {}^{*0} )/f_{ B ^0_ s \rightarrow K ^{*0} \overline{ K }{} {}^{*0} }$, and equivalently for the $ B ^0 \rightarrow \phi K ^{*0} $ decay. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic. 
Table_6.pdf [63 KiB] HiDef png [57 KiB] Thumbnail [10 KiB] tex code 
Created on 23 February 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 23 February 2019.