The differential branching fraction of the rare decay $\Lambda^{0}_{b} \rightarrow \Lambda \mu^+\mu^$ is measured as a function of $q^{2}$, the square of the dimuon invariant mass. The analysis is performed using protonproton collision data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $3.0 fb^{1}$, collected by the LHCb experiment. Evidence of signal is observed in the $q^2$ region below the square of the $J/\psi$ mass. Integrating over $15 < q^{2} < 20 GeV^2/c^4$ the branching fraction is measured as $d\mathcal{B}(\Lambda^{0}_{b} \rightarrow \Lambda \mu^+\mu^)/dq^2 = (1.18 ^{+ 0.09} _{0.08} \pm 0.03 \pm 0.27) \times 10^{7} ( GeV^{2}/c^{4})^{1}$, where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic and due to the normalisation mode, $\Lambda^{0}_{b} \rightarrow J/\psi \Lambda$, respectively. In the $q^2$ intervals where the signal is observed, angular distributions are studied and the forwardbackward asymmetries in the dimuon ($A^{l}_{\rm FB}$) and hadron ($A^{h}_{\rm FB}$) systems are measured for the first time. In the range $15 < q^2 < 20 GeV^2/c^4$ they are found to be $A^{l}_{\rm FB} = 0.05 \pm 0.09 (stat) \pm 0.03 (syst)$ and $A^{h}_{\rm FB} = 0.29 \pm 0.07 (stat) \pm 0.03 (syst)$.
Invariant mass distribution of the $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \Lambda $ candidates selected with the neural network requirement used for the high $ q^2$ region. The (black) points show data, combining downstream and long candidates, and the solid (blue) line represents the overall fit function. The dotted (red) line represents the combinatorial and the dashdotted (brown) line the peaking background from $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} K ^0_{\rm\scriptscriptstyle S} $ decays. 
figure1.pdf [22 KiB] HiDef png [207 KiB] Thumbnail [62 KiB] *.C file 

Invariant mass distribution of the $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ candidates, integrated over the region $15.0 < q^2 < 20.0$ $ {\mathrm{\,GeV^2\!/}c^4}$ together with the fit function described in the text. The points show data, the solid (blue) line is the overall fit function and the dotted (red) line represents the combinatorial background. The background component from $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^0_{\rm\scriptscriptstyle S} \mu ^+\mu ^ $ decays, (brown) dashed line, is barely visibile due to the very low yield. 
figure2.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [211 KiB] Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file 

Invariant mass distributions of $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ candidates, in eight $ q^2$ intervals, together with the fit function described in the text. The points show data, the solid (blue) line is the overall fit function and the dotted (red) line represents the combinatorial background component. 
figure3.pdf [43 KiB] HiDef png [847 KiB] Thumbnail [258 KiB] *.C file 

Total relative efficiency, $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{rel}}$, between $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ and $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \Lambda $ decays. The uncertainties are the combination of both statistical and systematic components, and are dominated by the latter. 
figure4.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [127 KiB] Thumbnail [59 KiB] *.C file 

Measured $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ branching fraction as a function of $ q^2$ with the predictions of the SM [15] superimposed. The inner error bars on data points represent the total uncertainty on the relative branching fraction (statistical and systematic); the outer error bar also includes the uncertainties from the branching fraction of the normalisation mode. 
figure5.pdf [20 KiB] HiDef png [126 KiB] Thumbnail [56 KiB] *.C file 

Angular efficiencies as a function of (left) $\cos\theta_\ell$ and (right) $\cos\theta_h$ for (upper) long and (lower) downstream candidates, in the interval $15 < q^2 < 20$ $ {\mathrm{\,GeV^2\!/}c^4}$ , obtained using simulated events. The (blue) line shows the fit that is used to model the angular acceptance in the fit to data. 
figure6a.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [130 KiB] Thumbnail [55 KiB] *.C file 

figure6b.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [59 KiB] *.C file 

figure6c.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [61 KiB] *.C file 

figure6d.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [156 KiB] Thumbnail [64 KiB] *.C file 

Angular distributions as a function of (left) $\cos \theta_\ell$ and (right) $\cos \theta_h$, for candidates in the integrated $15 < q^2 <20$ $ {\mathrm{\,GeV^2\!/}c^4}$ interval with the overall fit function overlaid (solid blue). The (red) dotted line represents the combinatorial background. 
figure7a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [143 KiB] Thumbnail [52 KiB] *.C file 

figure7b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [146 KiB] Thumbnail [55 KiB] *.C file 

Measured values of (left) the leptonic and (right) the hadronic forwardbackward asymmetries in bins of $ q^2$ . Data points are only shown for $ q^2$ intervals where a statistically significant signal yield is found, see text for details. The (red) triangle represents the values for the $15 < q^2 < 20$ $ {\mathrm{\,GeV^2\!/}c^4}$ interval. Standard Model predictions are obtained from Ref. [17]. 
figure8a.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [114 KiB] Thumbnail [52 KiB] *.C file 

figure8b.pdf [15 KiB] HiDef png [118 KiB] Thumbnail [55 KiB] *.C file 

Twodimensional 68 % CL region (black) as a function of $A_{\rm FB}^\ell$ and $f_{\rm L}$. The shaded area represents the region where the PDF is positive over the complete $\cos \theta_{\ell}$ range. The best fit point is given by the (blue) star. 
figure9.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [99 KiB] Thumbnail [41 KiB] *.C file 

Twodimensional 68 % CL regions (black) as a function of $A_{\rm FB}^\ell$ and $f_{\rm L}$. The shaded areas represent the regions in which the PDF is positive over the complete $\cos \theta_{\ell}$ range. The best fit points are indicated by the (blue) stars. 
figure10a.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [114 KiB] Thumbnail [46 KiB] *.C file 

figure10b.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [117 KiB] Thumbnail [48 KiB] *.C file 

figure10c.pdf [14 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [46 KiB] *.C file 

figure10d.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [102 KiB] Thumbnail [42 KiB] *.C file 

figure10e.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [107 KiB] Thumbnail [44 KiB] *.C file 

Animated gif made out of all figures. 
PAPER2015009.gif Thumbnail 
Number of $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \Lambda $ decays in the long and downstream categories found using the selection for low and high $ q^2$ regions. Uncertainties shown are statistical only. 
Table_1.pdf [37 KiB] HiDef png [59 KiB] Thumbnail [9 KiB] tex code 

Signal decay yields ($N_\mathrm{S}$) obtained from the mass fit to $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ candidates in each $ q^2$ interval together with their statistical significances. The yields are the sum of long and downstream categories with downstream decays comprising $\sim 80\,\%$ of the total yield. The $811$ and $12.515$ $ {\mathrm{\,GeV^2\!/}c^4}$ $ q^2$ intervals are excluded from the study as they are dominated by decays via charmonium resonances. 
Table_2.pdf [38 KiB] HiDef png [88 KiB] Thumbnail [15 KiB] tex code 

Systematic uncertainties as a function of $ q^2$ , assigned for yields and efficiencies. Values reported are the sums in quadrature of all contributions evaluated within each category. 
Table_3.pdf [46 KiB] HiDef png [76 KiB] Thumbnail [13 KiB] tex code 

Measured differential branching fraction of $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ , where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic and due to the uncertainty on the normalisation mode, $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \Lambda $ , respectively. 
Table_4.pdf [55 KiB] HiDef png [102 KiB] Thumbnail [18 KiB] tex code 

Measured values of leptonic and hadronic angular observables, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. 
Table_5.pdf [53 KiB] HiDef png [76 KiB] Thumbnail [14 KiB] tex code 

Differential branching fraction of the $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow \Lambda \mu ^+\mu ^ $ decay relative to $\Lambda ^0_ b \!\rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \Lambda $ decays, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. 
Table_6.pdf [68 KiB] HiDef png [101 KiB] Thumbnail [17 KiB] tex code 
Created on 16 February 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 21 February 2019.