A modeldependent amplitude analysis of the decay $B^0\rightarrow D(K^0_S\pi^+\pi^) K^{*0}$ is performed using protonproton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.0fb$^{1}$, recorded at $\sqrt{s}=7$ and $8 TeV$ by the LHCb experiment. The CP violation observables $x_{\pm}$ and $y_{\pm}$, sensitive to the CKM angle $\gamma$, are measured to be \begin{eqnarray*} x_ &=& 0.15 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.03 \pm 0.01, y_ &=& 0.25 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.01, x_+ &=& 0.05 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.01, y_+ &=& 0.65^{+0.24}_{0.23} \pm 0.08 \pm 0.01, \end{eqnarray*} where the first uncertainties are statistical, the second systematic and the third arise from the uncertainty on the $D\rightarrow K^0_S \pi^+\pi^$ amplitude model. These are the most precise measurements of these observables. They correspond to $\gamma=(80^{+21}_{22})^{\circ}$ and $r_{B^0}=0.39\pm0.13$, where $r_{B^0}$ is the magnitude of the ratio of the suppressed and favoured $B^0\rightarrow D K^+ \pi^$ decay amplitudes, in a $K\pi$ mass region of $\pm50 MeV$ around the $K^*(892)^0$ mass and for an absolute value of the cosine of the $K^{*0}$ decay angle larger than $0.4$.
Variation of signal efficiency across the phase space for (left) long and (right) downstream candidates. 
Fig1_left.eps [698 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [126 KiB] *.C file 

Fig1_right.eps [724 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [127 KiB] *.C file 

Invariant mass distribution for $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow D K ^{*0} $ long and downstream candidates. The fit result, including signal and background components, is superimposed (solid blue). The points are data, and the different fit components are given in the legend. The two vertical lines represent the signal region in which the $ C\!P$ fit is performed. 
Fig2.eps [33 KiB] HiDef png [399 KiB] Thumbnail [101 KiB] *.C file 

Selected $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow D K ^{*0} $ candidates, shown as (a) the Dalitz plot, and its projections on (b) $ m^2_$ , (c) $ m^2_+$ and (d) $ m^2_0$ {}. The line superimposed on the projections corresponds to the fit result and the points are data. 
Fig3a.eps [80 KiB] HiDef png [171 KiB] Thumbnail [51 KiB] *.C file 

Fig3b.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [48 KiB] *.C file 

Fig3c.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [135 KiB] Thumbnail [51 KiB] *.C file 

Fig3d.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [134 KiB] Thumbnail [50 KiB] *.C file 

Selected $\overline{ B }{} {}^0 \!\rightarrow D \overline{ K }{} {}^{*0} $ candidates, shown as (a) the Dalitz plot, and its projections on (b) $ m^2_$ , (c) $ m^2_+$ and (d) $ m^2_0$ {}. The line superimposed on the projections corresponds to the fit result and the points are data. 
Fig4a.eps [80 KiB] HiDef png [172 KiB] Thumbnail [52 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4b.eps [9 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [50 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4c.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [47 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4d.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [139 KiB] Thumbnail [48 KiB] *.C file 

Likelihood contours at 68.3% and 95.5% confidence level for $(x_{+},y_{+})$ (red) and $(x_{},y_{})$ (blue), obtained from the $ C\!P$ fit. 
Fig5.eps [7 KiB] HiDef png [170 KiB] Thumbnail [45 KiB] *.C file 

Confidence level curve on $\gamma$ , obtained using the "plugin" method [58]. 
Fig6.eps [60 KiB] HiDef png [176 KiB] Thumbnail [50 KiB] *.C file 

Confidence level curve on $ r_{ B ^0 }$ , obtained using the "plugin" method [58]. 
Fig7.eps [51 KiB] HiDef png [191 KiB] Thumbnail [56 KiB] *.C file 

Confidence level curve on $\delta_{ B ^0 }$ , obtained using the "plugin" method [58]. Only the $\delta_{ B ^0 }$ solution corresponding to $0<\gamma <180 ^{\circ} $ is highlighted; the other maximum is due to the $(\delta_{ B ^0 } ,\gamma )\rightarrow (\delta_{ B ^0 } +\pi,\gamma +\pi)$ ambiguity. 
Fig8.eps [62 KiB] HiDef png [238 KiB] Thumbnail [61 KiB] *.C file 

Twodimensional confidence level curves in the $(\gamma , r_{ B ^0 } )$ plane, obtained using the profilelikelihood method. 
Fig9.eps [12 KiB] HiDef png [337 KiB] Thumbnail [66 KiB] *.C file 

Twodimensional confidence level curves in the $(\gamma ,\delta_{ B ^0 } )$ plane, obtained using the profilelikelihood method. 
Fig10.eps [11 KiB] HiDef png [278 KiB] Thumbnail [57 KiB] *.C file 

Animated gif made out of all figures. 
PAPER2016007.gif Thumbnail 
Signal and background yields in the signal region, $\pm25\mathrm{\,MeV} $ around the $ B ^0$ mass, obtained from the invariant mass fit. Total yields, as well as separate yields for long and downstream candidates, are given. 
Table_1.pdf [53 KiB] HiDef png [110 KiB] Thumbnail [19 KiB] tex code 

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on $ z_{\pm}$ , in units of $(10^{3})$. The total experimental and total modelrelated uncertainties are also given as percentages of the statistical uncertainties. 
Table_2.pdf [59 KiB] HiDef png [127 KiB] Thumbnail [20 KiB] tex code 

Model related systematic uncertainties for each alternative model, in units of $(10^{3})$. The relative signs indicate full correlation or anticorrelation. 
Table_3.pdf [52 KiB] HiDef png [188 KiB] Thumbnail [30 KiB] tex code 
Created on 16 February 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 21 February 2019.