cern.ch

Updated branching fraction measurements of $B^0_{(s)} \to K_{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle S}}^0 h^+ h^{\prime -}$ decays

[to restricted-access page]

Abstract

The charmless three-body decays $B^0_{(s)} \to K_{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle S}}^0 h^+ h^{\prime -}$ (where $h^{(\prime)} = \pi, K$) are analysed using a sample of $pp$ collision data recorded by the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $3 fb^{-1}$. The branching fractions are measured relative to that of the $B^0 \to K_{\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle S}}^0 \pi^{+} \pi^{-}$ decay, and are determined to be: \begin{eqnarray*} \frac{{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp})}{{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})} = {} & 0.123 \pm 0.009 \; \mathrm{\,(stat)}\; \pm 0.015 \; \mathrm{\,(syst)}\,, \frac{{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}K^{+}K^{-})} {{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})} = {} & 0.549 \pm 0.018 \; \mathrm{\,(stat)}\; \pm 0.033 \; \mathrm{\,(syst)}\,, \frac{{\cal B}(B_{s}^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})}{{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})} = {} & 0.191 \pm 0.027 \; \mathrm{\,(stat)}\; \pm 0.031 \; \mathrm{\,(syst)}\; \pm 0.011 \; (f_s/f_d) \,, \frac{{\cal B}(B_{s}^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}K^{\pm}\pi^{\mp})} {{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})} = {} & 1.70\phantom{0} \pm 0.07\phantom{0} \; \mathrm{\,(stat)} \; \pm 0.11\phantom{0} \; \mathrm{\,(syst)}\; \pm 0.10\phantom{0} \; (f_s/f_d) \,, \frac{{\cal B}(B_{s}^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}K^{+}K^{-})}{{\cal B}(B^0\rightarrow K^0_{\rm S}\pi^{+}\pi^{-})} \in {} & [0.008 - 0.051] \rm at 90\% confidence level, \end{eqnarray*} where $f_s/f_d$ represents the ratio of hadronisation fractions of the $B^0_s$ and $B^0$ mesons.

Figures and captions

Invariant mass distributions of, from top to bottom, $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^\pm \pi ^\mp $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ candidates, summing the three periods of data taking, with the selection optimisation chosen for the favoured decay modes for (left) downstream and (right) long $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}}$ reconstruction categories. In each plot, data are the black points with error bars and the total fit model is overlaid (solid blue line). The $ B ^0$ ( $ B ^0_ s $ ) signal components are the pink (orange) short-dashed (dotted) lines, while fully reconstructed misidentified decays are the green and dark blue dashed lines close to the $ B ^0$ and $ B ^0_ s $ peaks. The sum of the partially reconstructed contributions from $ B $ to open charm decays, charmless hadronic decays, $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \eta ^{\prime} K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} $ and charmless radiative decays are the red dash triple-dotted lines. The combinatorial background contribution is the gray long-dash dotted line.

FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB]
*.C file
FusedCats-Loose-KSKKDD-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [230 KiB]
Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Loose-KSKKLL-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [271 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Loose-KSKpiDD-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Loose-KSKpiLL-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [244 KiB]
Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Loose-KSpipiDD-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [242 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Loose-KSpipiLL-log.pdf

Invariant mass distributions of, from top to bottom, $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^\pm \pi ^\mp $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ candidates, summing the three periods of data taking, with the selection optimisation chosen for the favoured decay modes for (left) downstream and (right) long $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}}$ reconstruction categories. In each plot, data are the black points with error bars and the total fit model is overlaid (solid blue line). The $ B ^0$ ( $ B ^0_ s $ ) signal components are the pink (orange) short-dashed (dotted) lines, while fully reconstructed misidentified decays are the green and dark blue dashed lines close to the $ B ^0$ and $ B ^0_ s $ peaks. The sum of the partially reconstructed contributions from $ B $ to open charm decays, charmless hadronic decays, $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \eta ^{\prime} K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} $ and charmless radiative decays are the red dash triple-dotted lines. The combinatorial background contribution is the gray long-dash dotted line.

FusedC[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [239 KiB]
Thumbnail [74 KiB]
*.C file
FusedCats-Tight-KSKKDD-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [209 KiB]
Thumbnail [67 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Tight-KSKKLL-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [271 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Tight-KSKpiDD-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Tight-KSKpiLL-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [250 KiB]
Thumbnail [74 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Tight-KSpipiDD-log.pdf
FusedC[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [249 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
FusedCats-Tight-KSpipiLL-log.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2011) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [247 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [247 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [282 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [282 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [92 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [92 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012a) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [240 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [240 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [278 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [278 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [268 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [268 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [280 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [280 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012b) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [282 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [282 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [283 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [283 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [278 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [278 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [239 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [239 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2011) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [224 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [224 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [232 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [232 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [286 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [286 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [243 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [243 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012a) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [233 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [233 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [231 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [231 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [275 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [275 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [275 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [275 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [269 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [269 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [240 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [240 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [232 KiB]
Thumbnail [73 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [232 KiB]
Thumbnail [73 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012b) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [235 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [235 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [232 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [232 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [280 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [280 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [270 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [270 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [284 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [284 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [233 KiB]
Thumbnail [73 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [233 KiB]
Thumbnail [73 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Loose-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2011) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [208 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [208 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [204 KiB]
Thumbnail [68 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [204 KiB]
Thumbnail [68 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [265 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [265 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [278 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [278 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [270 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [270 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [254 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [254 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [242 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [242 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012a) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [228 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [228 KiB]
Thumbnail [77 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [222 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [222 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [281 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [281 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [271 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [271 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [250 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [250 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [238 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [238 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012b) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [235 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [235 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [211 KiB]
Thumbnail [67 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [211 KiB]
Thumbnail [67 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [262 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [262 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [282 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [282 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [273 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [273 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [237 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [237 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiDD_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2011) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [186 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [186 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [188 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [188 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [255 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [255 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [243 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [243 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [228 KiB]
Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [228 KiB]
Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2011-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012a) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [182 KiB]
Thumbnail [63 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [182 KiB]
Thumbnail [63 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [197 KiB]
Thumbnail [69 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [197 KiB]
Thumbnail [69 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [90 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [90 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [238 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [238 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [225 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [225 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012a-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Results of the simultaneous fit to data (downstream, 2012b) with the BDT optimisation corresponding to the favoured decay modes. The modes $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ are shown from top to bottom. The left-hand side plots show the results with a logarithmic scale and the right-hand side with a linear scale. Legend is similar to that of plots shown in Fig. ???.

from51[..].pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [177 KiB]
Thumbnail [61 KiB]
*.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [177 KiB]
Thumbnail [61 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [183 KiB]
Thumbnail [64 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [183 KiB]
Thumbnail [64 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [248 KiB]
Thumbnail [80 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSKpiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [265 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [265 KiB]
Thumbnail [81 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [254 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [254 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpiKLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [244 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [244 KiB]
Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull_log.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [217 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf
from51[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [217 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
from5150-Louis-Polynomial-StrongPcut-Tight-KSpipiLL_2012b-Standard-DoubleCB-NoPull.pdf

Distribution of sPlot weights in data. The $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ K ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} K ^+ \pi ^- $ , $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ K ^- $ , and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}} \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ final states are shown from top to bottom, with a $ B ^0$ parent on the left, and a $ B ^0_ s $ on the right. All data-taking periods and $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}}$ reconstruction categories are added.

Dalitz[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [162 KiB]
Thumbnail [43 KiB]
*.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSKK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [162 KiB]
Thumbnail [43 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSKK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [141 KiB]
Thumbnail [39 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSKK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [141 KiB]
Thumbnail [39 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSKK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [157 KiB]
Thumbnail [42 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSKpi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [157 KiB]
Thumbnail [42 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSKpi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [173 KiB]
Thumbnail [49 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSKpi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [173 KiB]
Thumbnail [49 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSKpi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [165 KiB]
Thumbnail [46 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSpiK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [165 KiB]
Thumbnail [46 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSpiK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [173 KiB]
Thumbnail [48 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSpiK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [173 KiB]
Thumbnail [48 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSpiK.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [176 KiB]
Thumbnail [50 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSpipi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [176 KiB]
Thumbnail [50 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bd2KSpipi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [171 KiB]
Thumbnail [49 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSpipi.pdf
Dalitz[..].pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [171 KiB]
Thumbnail [49 KiB] *.C file
Dalitz-Bs2KSpipi.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2017-010.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2017-010.gif

Tables and captions

Signal yields obtained from the simultaneous fit to the data. The yields are the sum of those obtained in the three data-taking periods when fitting the data sample selected using the BDT optimisation chosen for the given decay mode. The uncertainties are statistical only. The average selection efficiencies, described in Sec. 5, are also shown for each decay mode together with the corresponding total uncertainty due to the limited simulation sample size and systematic effects in their determination.

Table_1.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [71 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Summary of the systematic uncertainties on the ratio of branching fractions. A weighted average of the two $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}}$ reconstruction categories and three data-taking periods is performed. The values quoted for the individual contributions, which are illustrative of the hierarchy between sources of systematic uncertainty, each result from a weighted average in which the other systematic uncertainty contributions are disregarded. The total uncertainty is the weighted average including all contributions. All uncertainties are relative and are quoted as percentages.

Table_2.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [67 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Signal yields obtained for the 2011 category from the simultaneous fit to the data. The yields shown are those obtained when fitting the data sample selected using the BDT optimisation chosen for the given decay mode. The uncertainties are statistical only. The average selection efficiencies, described in Sec. ???, are also shown for each decay mode together with the corresponding total uncertainty due to the limited simulation sample size and systematic effects in their determination.

Table_2.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [67 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Signal yields obtained for the 2011 category from the simultaneous fit to the data. The yields shown are those obtained when fitting the data sample selected using the BDT optimisation chosen for the given decay mode. The uncertainties are statistical only. The average selection efficiencies, described in Sec. ???, are also shown for each decay mode together with the corresponding total uncertainty due to the limited simulation sample size and systematic effects in their determination.

Table_3.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [66 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Signal yields obtained for the 2011 category from the simultaneous fit to the data. The yields shown are those obtained when fitting the data sample selected using the BDT optimisation chosen for the given decay mode. The uncertainties are statistical only. The average selection efficiencies, described in Sec. ???, are also shown for each decay mode together with the corresponding total uncertainty due to the limited simulation sample size and systematic effects in their determination.

Table_4.pdf [61 KiB]
HiDef png [66 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the ratios of branching fractions for downstream $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}}$ reconstruction. All uncertainties are relative and are quoted as percentages.

Table_6.pdf [78 KiB]
HiDef png [158 KiB]
Thumbnail [23 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the ratios of branching fractions for long $ K ^0_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle S}}$ reconstruction. All uncertainties are relative and are quoted as percentages.

Table_7.pdf [78 KiB]
HiDef png [158 KiB]
Thumbnail [23 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Created on 09 December 2018.Citation count from INSPIRE on 09 December 2018.