A test of lepton universality, performed by measuring the ratio of the branching fractions of the $B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\mu^{+}\mu^{}$ and $B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}e^{+}e^{}$ decays, $R_{K^{*0}}$, is presented. The $K^{*0}$ meson is reconstructed in the final state $K^{+}\pi^{}$, which is required to have an invariant mass within 100$\mathrm{\,MeV}c^2$ of the known $K^{*}(892)^{0}$ mass. The analysis is performed using protonproton collision data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of about 3$\mathrm{\,fb}^{1}$, collected by the LHCb experiment at centreofmass energies of 7 and 8$\mathrm{\,TeV}$. The ratio is measured in two regions of the dilepton invariant mass squared, $q^{2}$, to be \begin{eqnarray*} R_{K^{*0}} = \begin{cases} 0.66 ^{+ 0.11}_{ 0.07}\mathrm{\,(stat)} \pm 0.03\mathrm{\,(syst)} & \textrm{for } 0.045 < q^{2} < 1.1 \mathrm{\,GeV^2}c^4 \, , \\ 0.69 ^{+ 0.11}_{ 0.07}\mathrm{\,(stat)} \pm 0.05\mathrm{\,(syst)} & \textrm{for } 1.1\phantom{00} < q^{2} < 6.0 \mathrm{\,GeV^2}c^4 \, . \end{cases} \end{eqnarray*} The corresponding 95.4% confidence level intervals are $[0.52, 0.89]$ and $[0.53, 0.94]$. The results, which represent the most precise measurements of $R_{K^{*0}}$ to date, are compatible with the Standard Model expectations at the level of 2.12.3 and 2.42.5 standard deviations in the two $q^{2}$ regions, respectively.
Feynman diagrams in the SM of the $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} \ell^+ \ell^ $ decay for the (top left) electroweak penguin and (top right) box diagram. Possible NP contributions violating LU: (bottom left) a treelevel diagram mediated by a new gauge boson $ Z ^{\prime}$ and (bottom right) a treelevel diagram involving a leptoquark $LQ$. 
Fig1a.pdf [152 KiB] HiDef png [140 KiB] Thumbnail [28 KiB] *.C file 

Fig1b.pdf [130 KiB] HiDef png [126 KiB] Thumbnail [25 KiB] *.C file 

Fig1c.pdf [117 KiB] HiDef png [95 KiB] Thumbnail [18 KiB] *.C file 

Fig1d.pdf [120 KiB] HiDef png [80 KiB] Thumbnail [17 KiB] *.C file 

Number of candidates for $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} \ell^+ \ell^ $ final states with (left) muons and (right) electrons as a function of the dilepton invariant mass squared, $ q^2$ , and the fourbody invariant mass of the $ B ^0$ . 
Fig2a.pdf [82 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [223 KiB] *.C file 

Fig2b.pdf [71 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [195 KiB] *.C file 

Sketch of the topology of a $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} e ^+ e ^ $ decay. The transverse momentum lost via bremsstrahlung is evaluated as the difference between the $p_{\rm T}$ of the $ K ^{*0}$ meson and that of the dielectron system, where both are calculated with respect to the $ B ^0$ meson direction of flight. Bremsstrahlung photons that are not recovered by the reconstruction are assumed to follow the dielectron momentum direction. 
Fig3.pdf [51 KiB] HiDef png [164 KiB] Thumbnail [34 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4a.pdf [37 KiB] HiDef png [744 KiB] Thumbnail [170 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4b.pdf [33 KiB] HiDef png [668 KiB] Thumbnail [159 KiB] *.C file 

Fraction of (left) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} (\rightarrow e ^+ e ^ )$ and (right) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} \gamma(\rightarrow e ^+ e ^ )$ candidates (in percent) with zero, one, and two or more recovered clusters per trigger category. The numbers are from (darker colour) data and (lighter colour) simulation. Due to the very low opening angle of the two electrons in $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} \gamma(\rightarrow e ^+ e ^ )$ decays, the bremsstrahlung photon energy deposits overlap and only one bremsstrahlung cluster at most is resolved. 
Fig5a.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [138 KiB] Thumbnail [52 KiB] *.C file 

Fig5b.pdf [13 KiB] HiDef png [138 KiB] Thumbnail [52 KiB] *.C file 

Fit to the $ m( K ^+ \pi ^ \mu ^+\mu ^ )$ invariant mass of (top) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} \mu ^+\mu ^ $ in the low and central $ q^2$ bins and (bottom) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} (\!\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^ )$ candidates. The dashed line is the signal PDF, the shaded shapes are the background PDFs and the solid line is the total PDF. The fit residuals normalised to the data uncertainty are shown at the bottom of each distribution. 
Fig6a.pdf [21 KiB] HiDef png [224 KiB] Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file 

Fig6b.pdf [21 KiB] HiDef png [239 KiB] Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file 

Fig6c.pdf [31 KiB] HiDef png [221 KiB] Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file 

Fit to the $ m( K ^+ \pi ^ e ^+ e ^ )$ invariant mass of (top) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} e ^+ e ^ $ in the low and central $ q^2$ bins and (bottom) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} (\rightarrow e ^+ e ^ )$ candidates. The dashed line is the signal PDF, the shaded shapes are the background PDFs and the solid line is the total PDF. The fit residuals normalised to the data uncertainty are shown at the bottom of each distribution. 
Fig7a.pdf [27 KiB] HiDef png [241 KiB] Thumbnail [90 KiB] *.C file 

Fig7b.pdf [30 KiB] HiDef png [278 KiB] Thumbnail [100 KiB] *.C file 

Fig7c.pdf [34 KiB] HiDef png [253 KiB] Thumbnail [93 KiB] *.C file 

(hatched) Backgroundsubtracted distributions for (darker colour) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} \mu ^+\mu ^ $ and (lighter colour) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^{*0} e ^+ e ^ $ candidates, compared to (full line) simulation. From top to bottom: $ q^2$ , $ K ^+ \pi ^ $ invariant mass, $ m( K ^+ \pi ^ )$ , opening angle between the two leptons, $\theta_{\textrm{lepton}}$, and projection along the beam axis of the distance between the $ K ^+ \pi ^ $ and $\ell^+ \ell^ $ vertices, $\Delta z_{\textrm{vertex}}$. The distributions are normalised to unity. The hatched areas correspond to the statistical uncertainties only. The data are not efficiency corrected. 
Fig8a.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [448 KiB] Thumbnail [90 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8b.pdf [18 KiB] HiDef png [552 KiB] Thumbnail [110 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8c.pdf [18 KiB] HiDef png [456 KiB] Thumbnail [96 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8d.pdf [18 KiB] HiDef png [469 KiB] Thumbnail [104 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8e.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [402 KiB] Thumbnail [90 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8f.pdf [18 KiB] HiDef png [464 KiB] Thumbnail [101 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8g.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [362 KiB] Thumbnail [85 KiB] *.C file 

Fig8h.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [310 KiB] Thumbnail [79 KiB] *.C file 

Distributions of the $ R_{ K ^{*0} }$ delta loglikelihood for the three trigger categories separately and combined. 
Fig9a.pdf [24 KiB] HiDef png [222 KiB] Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file 

Fig9b.pdf [24 KiB] HiDef png [231 KiB] Thumbnail [73 KiB] *.C file 

(left) Comparison of the LHCb $ R_{ K ^{*0} }$ measurements with the SM theoretical predictions: BIP [26] CDHMV [27,28,29], \texttt{EOS} [30,31], \texttt{flav.io} [33,34,35] and JC [36]. The predictions are displaced horizontally for presentation. (right) Comparison of the LHCb $ R_{ K ^{*0} }$ measurements with previous experimental results from the $ B $ factories [4,5]. In the case of the $ B $ factories the specific vetoes for charmonium resonances are not represented. 
Fig10a.pdf [176 KiB] HiDef png [96 KiB] Thumbnail [46 KiB] *.C file 

Fig10b.pdf [129 KiB] HiDef png [82 KiB] Thumbnail [38 KiB] *.C file 

Animated gif made out of all figures. 
PAPER2017013.gif Thumbnail 
Recent SM predictions for $ R_{ K ^{*0} }$ . 
Table_1.pdf [85 KiB] HiDef png [98 KiB] Thumbnail [15 KiB] tex code 

Yields obtained from the mass fits to the muon and electron (in the three trigger categories) channels. The uncertainties are statistical only. 
Table_2.pdf [47 KiB] HiDef png [48 KiB] Thumbnail [8 KiB] tex code 

Efficiency ratios between the nonresonant and resonant modes, $\varepsilon_{\ell^+ \ell^ } / \varepsilon_{ { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} (\ell^+ \ell^ ) }$, for the muon and electron (in the three trigger categories) channels. The uncertainties are statistical only. 
Table_3.pdf [66 KiB] HiDef png [78 KiB] Thumbnail [12 KiB] tex code 

Systematic uncertainties on the $ R_{ K ^{*0} }$ ratio for the three trigger categories separately (in percent). The total uncertainty is the sum in quadrature of all the contributions. 
Table_4.pdf [56 KiB] HiDef png [86 KiB] Thumbnail [14 KiB] tex code 

Measured $ R_{ K ^{*0} }$ ratios in the two $ q^2$ regions. The first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. About 50% of the systematic uncertainty is correlated between the two $ q^2$ bins. The 95.4% and 99.7% confidence level (CL) intervals include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties. 
Table_5.pdf [65 KiB] HiDef png [46 KiB] Thumbnail [7 KiB] tex code 
Created on 09 December 2018.Citation count from INSPIRE on 18 December 2018.