cern.ch

Studies of the resonance structure in $D^{0} \to K^\mp \pi^\pm \pi^\pm \pi^\mp$ decays

[to restricted-access page]

Abstract

Amplitude models are constructed to describe the resonance structure of ${D^{0}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}$ and ${D^{0} \to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}}$ decays using $pp$ collision data collected at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the LHCb experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $3.0\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. The largest contributions to both decay amplitudes are found to come from axial resonances, with decay modes $D^{0} \to a_1(1260)^{+} K^{-}$ and $D^{0} \to K_1(1270/1400)^{+} \pi^{-}$ being prominent in ${D^{0}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}}$ and $D^{0}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}$, respectively. Precise measurements of the lineshape parameters and couplings of the $a_1(1260)^{+}$, $K_1(1270)^{-}$ and $K(1460)^{-}$ resonances are made, and a quasi model-independent study of the $K(1460)^{-}$ resonance is performed. The coherence factor of the decays is calculated from the amplitude models to be $R_{K3\pi} = 0.459\pm 0.010\,(\mathrm{stat}) \pm 0.012\,(\mathrm{syst}) \pm 0.020\,(\mathrm{model})$, which is consistent with direct measurements. These models will be useful in future measurements of the unitary-triangle angle $\gamma$ and studies of charm mixing and $C\!P$ violation.

Figures and captions

Invariant mass and mass difference distributions for RS (top) and WS (bottom) samples, shown with fit projections. The signal region is indicated by the filled grey area, and for each plot the mass window in the orthogonal projection is applied.

Fig1a.pdf [70 KiB]
HiDef png [335 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [339 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
Fig1b.pdf
Fig1c.pdf [72 KiB]
HiDef png [412 KiB]
Thumbnail [92 KiB] *.C file
Fig1c.pdf
Fig1d.pdf [65 KiB]
HiDef png [410 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
Fig1d.pdf

Distributions for six invariant-mass observables in the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . Bands indicate the expectation from the model, with the width of the band indicating the total systematic uncertainty. The total background contribution, which is very low, is shown as a filled area. In figures that involve a single positively-charged pion, one of the two identical pions is selected randomly.

Fig2a.pdf [76 KiB]
HiDef png [376 KiB]
Thumbnail [85 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2a.pdf
Fig2b.pdf [77 KiB]
HiDef png [432 KiB]
Thumbnail [95 KiB] *.C file
Fig2b.pdf
Fig2c.pdf [73 KiB]
HiDef png [324 KiB]
Thumbnail [74 KiB] *.C file
Fig2c.pdf
Fig2d.pdf [75 KiB]
HiDef png [411 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB] *.C file
Fig2d.pdf
Fig2e.pdf [74 KiB]
HiDef png [380 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
Fig2e.pdf
Fig2f.pdf [74 KiB]
HiDef png [399 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB] *.C file
Fig2f.pdf

Argand diagram for the model-independent partial-wave analysis (MIPWA) for the $ K (1460)$ resonance. Points show the values of the amplitude that are determined by the fit, with only statistical uncertainties shown.

Fig3.pdf [42 KiB]
HiDef png [152 KiB]
Thumbnail [34 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3.pdf

Parity violating distributions for the RS decay in the $\overline{ K }{} {}^* (892)^{0}\rho(770)^{0}$ region defined by $\pm 35 \mathrm{\,MeV} $($\pm 100 \mathrm{\,MeV} $) mass windows about the nominal $\overline{ K }{} {}^* (892)^{0}$ $(\rho(770)^{0})$ masses. Bands show the predictions of the fitted model including systematic uncertainties.

Fig4a.pdf [61 KiB]
HiDef png [561 KiB]
Thumbnail [114 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4a.pdf
Fig4b.pdf [61 KiB]
HiDef png [575 KiB]
Thumbnail [115 KiB] *.C file
Fig4b.pdf
Fig4c.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [556 KiB]
Thumbnail [108 KiB] *.C file
Fig4c.pdf
Fig4d.pdf [59 KiB]
HiDef png [549 KiB]
Thumbnail [116 KiB] *.C file
Fig4d.pdf

Distributions for six invariant-mass observables in the WS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- \pi ^- \pi ^+ $ . Bands indicate the expectation from the model, with the width of the band indicating the total systematic uncertainty. The total background contribution is shown as a filled area, with the lower region indicating the expected contribution from mistagged $\overline{ D }{} {}^0 \rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- \pi ^- \pi ^+ $ decays. In figures that involve a single negatively-charged pion, one of the two identical pions is selected randomly.

Fig5a.pdf [58 KiB]
HiDef png [384 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5a.pdf
Fig5b.pdf [68 KiB]
HiDef png [511 KiB]
Thumbnail [112 KiB] *.C file
Fig5b.pdf
Fig5c.pdf [56 KiB]
HiDef png [384 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
Fig5c.pdf
Fig5d.pdf [58 KiB]
HiDef png [480 KiB]
Thumbnail [111 KiB] *.C file
Fig5d.pdf
Fig5e.pdf [58 KiB]
HiDef png [474 KiB]
Thumbnail [106 KiB] *.C file
Fig5e.pdf
Fig5f.pdf [58 KiB]
HiDef png [477 KiB]
Thumbnail [107 KiB] *.C file
Fig5f.pdf

Distributions for six invariant-mass observables in the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . Bands indicate the expectation from a model which excludes the decay chain $K_1(1270)^{-}\rightarrow \rho(1450)^{0} K ^- $, with the width of the band indicating the total systematic uncertainty. The total background contribution, which is very low, is shown in green.

Fig6a.pdf [76 KiB]
HiDef png [385 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [77 KiB]
HiDef png [439 KiB]
Thumbnail [96 KiB] *.C file
Fig6b.pdf
Fig6c.pdf [74 KiB]
HiDef png [328 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
Fig6c.pdf
Fig6d.pdf [75 KiB]
HiDef png [419 KiB]
Thumbnail [91 KiB] *.C file
Fig6d.pdf
Fig6e.pdf [74 KiB]
HiDef png [388 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
Fig6e.pdf
Fig6f.pdf [74 KiB]
HiDef png [407 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB] *.C file
Fig6f.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2017-040.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2017-040.gif

Tables and captions

Signal and background yields for both samples in the signal region, presented separately for each year of data taking.

Table_1.pdf [48 KiB]
HiDef png [65 KiB]
Thumbnail [12 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Fit fractions and coupling parameters for the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. Couplings $g$ are defined with respect to the coupling to the channel $ D ^0 \rightarrow[\overline{ K }{} {}^* (892)^{0}\rho(770)^{0}]^{L=2}$. Also given are the $\chi^2$ and the number of degrees of freedom ($\nu$) from the fit and their ratio.

Table_2.pdf [73 KiB]
HiDef png [187 KiB]
Thumbnail [29 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters for the component involving the $ a_{1}(1260)^{+}$ meson, from the fit performed on the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . The coupling parameters are defined with respect to the $ a_{1}(1260)^{+} \rightarrow\rho(770)^{0}\pi ^+ $ coupling. For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_3.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [59 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters for the component involving the $ K_{1}(1270) ^{-}$ meson, from the fit performed on the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . The coupling parameters are defined with respect to the $ K_{1}(1270) ^{-}\rightarrow\rho(770)^{0} K ^- $ coupling. For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_4.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [75 KiB]
Thumbnail [13 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters for the component involving the $ K(1460)^{-}$ meson, from the fit performed on the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . The coupling parameters are defined with respect to the $ K(1460)^{-} \rightarrow\overline{ K }{} {}^* (892)^{0}\pi ^- $ coupling. For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_5.pdf [57 KiB]
HiDef png [52 KiB]
Thumbnail [9 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Fit fractions and coupling parameters for the WS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- \pi ^- \pi ^+ $ . For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. Couplings $g$ are defined with respect to the coupling to the decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow[ K ^{*}(892)^{0}\rho(770)^{0}]^{L=2}$. Also given are the $\chi^2$ and the number of degrees of freedom ($\nu$) from the fit and their ratio.

Table_6.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [100 KiB]
Thumbnail [16 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Decay chains taken into account in alternative parametrisations of the RS decay mode ${ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- }$. For each chain, the fraction of models in the ensemble that contain this decay, together with the associated average fit fraction, $\langle \mathcal{F} \rangle$, are shown. Components are not tabulated if they contribute to all models in the ensemble, or if they contribute to less than 5% of the models.

Table_7.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [152 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Dependence of fit fractions (and partial fractions) on the choice of the RS model. This dependence is expressed as the mean value and the RMS of the values in the ensemble. Also shown is the fit fractions of the baseline model presented in Sect. 6.2.

Table_8.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [272 KiB]
Thumbnail [45 KiB]
tex code
Table_8.pdf

Dependence of the fitted masses and widths on the final choice of the RS model. This dependence is expressed as the mean value and the RMS of the values in the ensemble. The values found for the baseline model presented in Sect. 6.2 are reported for comparison.

Table_9.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [88 KiB]
Thumbnail [15 KiB]
tex code
Table_9.pdf

Decay chains taken into account in alternative parametrisations of the WS decay mode ${ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- \pi ^- \pi ^+ }$. For each chain, the fraction of models in the ensemble that contain this decay, together with the associated average fit fraction, $\langle \mathcal{F} \rangle$, are shown. Components are not tabulated if they contribute to all models in the ensemble, or if they contribute to less than 5% of the models.

Table_10.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [154 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_10.pdf

Coherence factor and average strong-phase differences in regions of phase space. The spread of coherence factors, average strong-phase difference and ratio of amplitudes from choice of WS model characterised with the RMS of the distribution.

Table_11.pdf [51 KiB]
HiDef png [112 KiB]
Thumbnail [21 KiB]
tex code
Table_11.pdf

Rules for calculating the current associated with a given decay chain in terms of the currents of the decay products. Where relevant, the spin projection operator $\mathcal{S}$ and the orbital angular momentum operators $L$ are those for the decaying particle.

Table_12.pdf [58 KiB]
HiDef png [139 KiB]
Thumbnail [22 KiB]
tex code
Table_12.pdf

Legend for systematic uncertainties, including whether this sources of uncertainty is considered on the RS/WS decay mode.

Table_13.pdf [26 KiB]
HiDef png [80 KiB]
Thumbnail [13 KiB]
tex code
Table_13.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the RS decay coupling parameters and fit fractions for quasi two-body decay chains.

Table_14.pdf [70 KiB]
HiDef png [298 KiB]
Thumbnail [40 KiB]
tex code
Table_14.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the RS decay coupling parameters, fit fractions and masses and widths of resonances for cascade topology decay chains.

Table_15.pdf [66 KiB]
HiDef png [411 KiB]
Thumbnail [57 KiB]
tex code
Table_15.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the WS decay coupling parameters and fit fractions.

Table_16.pdf [62 KiB]
HiDef png [193 KiB]
Thumbnail [26 KiB]
tex code
Table_16.pdf

Interference fractions for the RS mode $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ , only shown for fractions $>0.5\%$. For each fraction, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_17.pdf [62 KiB]
HiDef png [175 KiB]
Thumbnail [28 KiB]
tex code
Table_17.pdf

Interference fractions for the WS mode $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- \pi ^- \pi ^+ $ , only shown for fractions $>0.5\%$. For each fraction, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_18.pdf [62 KiB]
HiDef png [130 KiB]
Thumbnail [20 KiB]
tex code
Table_18.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters and other quantities for the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ , for a model excluding the decay chain $K_1(1270)^{-}\rightarrow \rho(1450)^0 K ^- $. Also given is the $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom ($\nu$) for the fit. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. Couplings are defined with respect to the coupling to the channel $ D ^0 \rightarrow[\overline{ K }{} {}^* (892)^{0}\rho(770)^{0}]^{L=2}$.

Table_19.pdf [73 KiB]
HiDef png [186 KiB]
Thumbnail [29 KiB]
tex code
Table_19.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters for the component involving the $ a_{1}(1260)^{+}$ meson, from the fit performed on the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . The coupling parameters are defined with respect to the $ a_{1}(1260)^{+} \rightarrow\rho(770)^{0}\pi ^+ $ coupling. For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_20.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [59 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_20.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters for the component involving the $ K_{1}(1270) ^{-}$ meson, from the fit performed on the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . The coupling parameters are defined with respect to the $ K_{1}(1270) ^{-}\rightarrow\rho(770)^{0} K ^- $ coupling. For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_21.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [65 KiB]
Thumbnail [11 KiB]
tex code
Table_21.pdf

Table of fit fractions and coupling parameters for the component involving the $ K(1460)^{-}$ meson, from the fit performed on the RS decay $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ . The coupling parameters are defined with respect to the $ K(1460)^{-} \rightarrow\overline{ K }{} {}^* (892)^{0}\pi ^- $ coupling. For each parameter, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Table_22.pdf [57 KiB]
HiDef png [51 KiB]
Thumbnail [8 KiB]
tex code
Table_22.pdf

Created on 11 December 2018.Citation count from INSPIRE on 11 December 2018.