cern.ch

Measurement of $C\!P$ asymmetries in two-body $B_{(s)}^{0}$-meson decays to charged pions and kaons

[to restricted-access page]

Abstract

The time-dependent $C\!P$ asymmetries in $B^0\to\pi^+\pi^-$ and $B_s^0\to K^+\!K^-$ decays are measured using a data sample of $pp$ collisions corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.0 fb$^{-1}$, collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV. The same data sample is used to measure the time-integrated $C\!P$ asymmetries in $B^0\to K^+\pi^-$ and $B_s^0\to\pi^+ K^-$ decays. The results are $C_{\pi^+\pi^-} = -0.34 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.01$, $S_{\pi^+\pi^-} = -0.63 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.01$, $C_{K^+\!K^-} = 0.20 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02$, $S_{K^+\!K^-} = 0.18 \pm 0.06 \pm 0.02$, $C_{K^+\!K^-}^{\Delta\Gamma} = -0.79 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.10$, $A_{C\!P}^{B^0} = -0.084 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.003$, and $A_{C\!P}^{B_s^0} = 0.213 \pm 0.015 \pm 0.007$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. Evidence for $C\!P$ violation is found in the $B_s^0\to K^+\!K^-$ decay for the first time.

Figures and captions

Efficiencies as a function of decay time for (top left) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- $ , (top right) $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow \pi ^+ \! K ^- $ , (bottom left) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ and (bottom right) $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow K ^+ \! K ^- $ decays. The black line is the result of the best fit of Eq. 13 to the histograms, obtained as described in the text. The dark and bright areas correspond to the 68% and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.

Fig1a.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [308 KiB]
Thumbnail [53 KiB]
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [306 KiB]
Thumbnail [54 KiB]
Fig1b.pdf
Fig1c.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [326 KiB]
Thumbnail [54 KiB]
Fig1c.pdf
Fig1d.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [310 KiB]
Thumbnail [54 KiB]
Fig1d.pdf

The triangles represent the standard deviation of the difference between the reconstructed ($t$) and true decay ($t_{\rm true}$) time versus $\delta_t$ for simulated (left) $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow \pi ^+ \! K ^- $ and (right) $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow D ^-_ s \pi ^+ $ decays. The dotted lines are the results of linear-function fits. The histograms represent the corresponding $\delta_t$ distributions with arbitrary normalisations.

Fig2a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [262 KiB]
Thumbnail [55 KiB]
Fig2a.pdf
Fig2b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [265 KiB]
Thumbnail [55 KiB]
Fig2b.pdf

Time-dependent asymmetries of (left) $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow D ^- \pi ^+ $ and (right) $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow D ^-_ s \pi ^+ $ decays obtained from data. The results of the best fits are superimposed. The time-dependent asymmetry of the $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow D ^-_ s \pi ^+ $ decays is folded into one mixing period $2\pi/\Delta m_{ s } $ of the $ B ^0_ s $ meson. The parameter $t_0 = 0.3 {\mathrm{ \,ps}} $ corresponds to the minimum value allowed by the selection.

Fig3a.pdf [32 KiB]
HiDef png [293 KiB]
Thumbnail [64 KiB]
Fig3a.pdf
Fig3b.pdf [30 KiB]
HiDef png [290 KiB]
Thumbnail [61 KiB]
Fig3b.pdf

Distributions of (top left) invariant mass, (top right) decay time, (middle left) decay-time uncertainty, (middle right) $\eta_{\rm OS}$, and (bottom) $\eta_{\rm SSc}$ for candidates in the $ K ^\pm$ $\pi ^\mp$ sample. The result of the simultaneous fit is overlaid. The individual components are also shown.

Fig4a.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [341 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB]
Fig4a.pdf
Fig4b.pdf [64 KiB]
HiDef png [346 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB]
Fig4b.pdf
Fig4c.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [289 KiB]
Thumbnail [64 KiB]
Fig4c.pdf
Fig4d.pdf [36 KiB]
HiDef png [435 KiB]
Thumbnail [88 KiB]
Fig4d.pdf
Fig4e.pdf [33 KiB]
HiDef png [315 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB]
Fig4e.pdf
Fig4f.pdf [12 KiB]
HiDef png [210 KiB]
Thumbnail [43 KiB]
Fig4f.pdf

Distributions of (top left) invariant mass, (top right) decay time, (middle left) decay-time uncertainty, (middle right) $\eta_{\rm OS}$, and (bottom) $\eta_{\rm SSc}$ for candidates in the $\pi ^+$ $\pi ^-$ sample. The result of the simultaneous fit is overlaid. The individual components are also shown.

Fig5a.pdf [46 KiB]
HiDef png [380 KiB]
Thumbnail [75 KiB]
Fig5a.pdf
Fig5b.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [352 KiB]
Thumbnail [68 KiB]
Fig5b.pdf
Fig5c.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [292 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB]
Fig5c.pdf
Fig5d.pdf [35 KiB]
HiDef png [411 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB]
Fig5d.pdf
Fig5e.pdf [33 KiB]
HiDef png [323 KiB]
Thumbnail [68 KiB]
Fig5e.pdf
Fig5f.pdf [12 KiB]
HiDef png [176 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB]
Fig5f.pdf

Distributions of (top left) invariant mass, (top right) decay time, (middle left) decay-time uncertainty, (middle right) $\eta_{\rm OS}$, and (bottom) $\eta_{{\rm SS} K }$ for candidates in the $ K ^+ \! K ^- $ sample. The result of the simultaneous fit is overlaid. The individual components are also shown.

Fig6a.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [328 KiB]
Thumbnail [64 KiB]
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [391 KiB]
Thumbnail [74 KiB]
Fig6b.pdf
Fig6c.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [273 KiB]
Thumbnail [60 KiB]
Fig6c.pdf
Fig6d.pdf [35 KiB]
HiDef png [434 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB]
Fig6d.pdf
Fig6e.pdf [34 KiB]
HiDef png [314 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB]
Fig6e.pdf
Fig6f.pdf [12 KiB]
HiDef png [214 KiB]
Thumbnail [44 KiB]
Fig6f.pdf

Time-dependent asymmetries for $ K ^\pm$ $\pi ^\mp$ candidates with invariant-mass values in the interval $5.20 < m < 5.32 {\mathrm{\,GeV\!/}c^2} $: (left) using the OS-tagging decision and (right) the SS-tagging decision. The result of the simultaneous fit is overlaid.

Fig7a.pdf [31 KiB]
HiDef png [295 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB]
Fig7a.pdf
Fig7b.pdf [31 KiB]
HiDef png [280 KiB]
Thumbnail [63 KiB]
Fig7b.pdf

Time-dependent asymmetries for (top) $\pi ^+$ $\pi ^-$ and (bottom) $ K ^+ \! K ^- $ candidates with mass values in the intervals $5.20 < m < 5.35 {\mathrm{\,GeV\!/}c^2} $ and $5.30 < m < 5.44 {\mathrm{\,GeV\!/}c^2} $, respectively: (left) using the OS-tagging decision and (right) using either the SSc-tagging decision (for the $\pi ^+$ $\pi ^-$ candidates) or the SS $ K $ -tagging decision (for the $ K ^+ \! K ^- $ candidates). The result of the simultaneous fit is overlaid.

Fig8a.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [59 KiB]
Fig8a.pdf
Fig8b.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [256 KiB]
Thumbnail [57 KiB]
Fig8b.pdf
Fig8c.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [258 KiB]
Thumbnail [55 KiB]
Fig8c.pdf
Fig8d.pdf [28 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [53 KiB]
Fig8d.pdf

Relation between $\omega_{\rm tag}$ on $\eta_{\rm tag}$ for (top left) SS $\pi $ , (top right) SS $ p $ , (bottom left) SSc and (bottom right) SS $ K $ taggers. The black dots represent the average value of $\omega_{\rm tag}$ in bins of $\eta_{\rm tag}$, as described in the text. The black straight line represents the linear relation between $\omega_{\rm tag}$ and $\eta_{\rm tag}$ obtained from the calibration procedure. The darker and brighter areas are the corresponding 68% and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. The distributions of $\eta_{\rm tag}$ are also reported as histograms with arbitrary normalisations.

Fig9a.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [358 KiB]
Thumbnail [54 KiB]
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [389 KiB]
Thumbnail [55 KiB]
Fig9b.pdf
Fig9c.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [331 KiB]
Thumbnail [53 KiB]
Fig9c.pdf
Fig9d.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [365 KiB]
Thumbnail [54 KiB]
Fig9d.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2018-006.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2018-006.gif

Tables and captions

Current experimental knowledge on $ C_{\pi ^+ \pi ^- } $ , $ S_{\pi ^+ \pi ^- } $ , $ C_{ K ^+ \! K ^- } $ and $ S_{ K ^+ \! K ^- } $ . For the experimental measurements, the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic, whereas for the averages the uncertainties include both contributions. The correlation factors, denoted as $\rho$, are also reported.

Table_1.pdf [53 KiB]
HiDef png [53 KiB]
Thumbnail [9 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Current experimental knowledge on $A_{ C\!P }$ for $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow K ^+ \pi ^- $ and $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow \pi ^+ \! K ^- $ decays. For the experimental measurements, the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic, whereas for the averages the uncertainties include both contributions.

Table_2.pdf [67 KiB]
HiDef png [55 KiB]
Thumbnail [10 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Values of the parameters $\Delta m_{ d }$ , $\Delta m_{ s }$ , $\Gamma_{ d }$ , $\Gamma_{ s }$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{ s }$ [19], fixed to their central values in the fit to the data. For $\Gamma_{ s }$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{ s }$ the correlation factor between the two quantities is also reported. The decay width difference $\Delta\Gamma_{ d }$ is fixed to zero.

Table_3.pdf [51 KiB]
HiDef png [89 KiB]
Thumbnail [16 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Tagging powers for the $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ and $ B ^0_ s \!\rightarrow K ^+ \! K ^- $ decays (last two rows), with a breakdown of the OS and SS contributions.

Table_4.pdf [52 KiB]
HiDef png [80 KiB]
Thumbnail [15 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Systematic uncertainties on the various $ C\!P$ -violating parameters. When present, the dash indicates that the uncertainty is not applicable to the given case.

Table_5.pdf [63 KiB]
HiDef png [160 KiB]
Thumbnail [23 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Statistical correlations among the $ C\!P$ -violating parameters.

Table_6.pdf [61 KiB]
HiDef png [47 KiB]
Thumbnail [8 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Values for the calibration parameters of the flavour tagging obtained from the fits. The values of $\hat{\eta}_{\rm OS}$ and $\hat{\eta}_{\rm SS}$ are fixed in the fit to $0.37$ and $0.44$, respectively.

Table_7.pdf [36 KiB]
HiDef png [145 KiB]
Thumbnail [25 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Calibration parameters for the SS $ K $ tagger.

Table_8.pdf [36 KiB]
HiDef png [81 KiB]
Thumbnail [14 KiB]
tex code
Table_8.pdf

Created on 18 December 2018.Citation count from INSPIRE on 18 December 2018.