cern.ch

Evidence for an $\eta_c(1S) \pi^-$ resonance in $B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-$ decays

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Contact

Abstract

A Dalitz plot analysis of $B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-$ decays is performed using data samples of $pp$ collisions collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of $\sqrt{s}=7, 8$ and $13$ TeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of $4.7 \text{fb}^{-1}$. A satisfactory description of the data is obtained when including a contribution representing an exotic $\eta_c(1S) \pi^-$ resonant state. The significance of this exotic resonance is more than three standard deviations, while its mass and width are $4096 \pm 20 ^{+18}_{-22}$ MeV and $152 \pm 58 ^{+60}_{-35}$ MeV, respectively. The spin-parity assignments $J^P=0^+$ and $J^{P}=1^-$ are both consistent with the data. In addition, the first measurement of the $B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-$ branching fraction is performed and gives $\displaystyle \mathcal{B}(B^0 \to \eta_c(1S) K^+\pi^-) = (5.73 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.66) \times 10^{-4}$, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to limited knowledge of external branching fractions.

Figures and captions

Feynman diagrams for \subref{B2etacKstar} $B^0 \rightarrow \eta_cK^{*0}$ and \subref{B2ZK} $B^0 \rightarrow Z_c^-K^+$ decay sequences.

Fig1a.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [32 KiB]
Thumbnail [6 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [150 KiB]
HiDef png [57 KiB]
Thumbnail [13 KiB] *.C file
Fig1b.pdf

Distribution of the $ p $ $\overline p $ $ K ^+$ $\pi ^-$ invariant mass. The solid blue curve is the projection of the total fit result. The components are shown in the legend.

Fig2.pdf [38 KiB]
HiDef png [257 KiB]
Thumbnail [86 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2.pdf

Distribution of the $ p $ $\overline p $ invariant mass in (left) linear and (right) logarithmic vertical-axis scale for weighted $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow p \overline p K ^+ \pi ^- $ candidates obtained by using the sPlot technique. The solid blue curve is the projection of the total fit result. The full azure, tight-cross-hatched red and dashed-black line areas show the $\eta _ c $ , $ { J \mskip -3mu/\mskip -2mu\psi \mskip 2mu}$ and NR $ p $ $\overline p $ contributions, respectively.

Fig3a.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [290 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3a.pdf
Fig3b.pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [606 KiB]
Thumbnail [96 KiB] *.C file
Fig3b.pdf

Results of the 2D mass fit to the joint [$ m( p \overline p K ^+ \pi ^- )$, $ m( p \overline p )$] distribution for the (a) Run 1 $ m( p \overline p K ^+ \pi ^- )$ projection, (b) Run 1 $ m( p \overline p )$ projection, (c) Run 2 $ m( p \overline p K ^+ \pi ^- )$ projection, and (d) Run 2 $ m( p \overline p )$ projection. The legend is shown in the top left plot.

Fig4a.pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [273 KiB]
Thumbnail [89 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4a.pdf
Fig4c.pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [238 KiB]
Thumbnail [76 KiB] *.C file
Fig4c.pdf
Fig4b.pdf [21 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
Fig4b.pdf
Fig4d.pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [241 KiB]
Thumbnail [78 KiB] *.C file
Fig4d.pdf

SDP distributions used in the DP fit to the Run 2 subsample for (a) combinatorial background and (b) NR $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow p \overline p K ^+ \pi ^- $ background.

Fig5a.pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [158 KiB]
Thumbnail [58 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5a.pdf
Fig5b.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [153 KiB]
Thumbnail [58 KiB] *.C file
Fig5b.pdf

Background-subtracted (top) DP and (bottom) SDP distributions corresponding to the total data sample used in the analysis. The structure corresponding to the $K^*(892)^0$ resonance is evident. The veto of $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \eta _ c K ^+ \pi ^- $ decays in the $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ region is visible in the DP.

Fig6a.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [239 KiB]
Thumbnail [125 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [229 KiB]
Thumbnail [122 KiB] *.C file
Fig6b.pdf

$ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \eta _ c K ^+ \pi ^- $ signal efficiency across the SDP for the (a) Run 1 and (b) Run 2 samples.

Fig7a.pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [216 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7a.pdf
Fig7b.pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [217 KiB]
Thumbnail [66 KiB] *.C file
Fig7b.pdf

Projections of the data and amplitude fit using the baseline model onto (a) $ m( K ^+ \pi ^- )$, (c) $ m(\eta _ c \pi ^- )$ and (e) $ m(\eta _ c K ^+ )$, with the same projections shown in (b), (d) and (f) with a logarithmic vertical-axis scale. The veto of $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow p \overline p \overline{ D }{} {}^0 $ decays is visible in plot (b). The $ K ^+ \pi ^- $ S-wave component comprises the LASS and $K^*_0(1950)^0$ meson contributions. The components are described in the legend at the bottom.

Fig8a.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [166 KiB]
Thumbnail [57 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8a.pdf
Fig8b.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [426 KiB]
Thumbnail [83 KiB] *.C file
Fig8b.pdf
Fig8c.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [269 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
Fig8c.pdf
Fig8d.pdf [26 KiB]
HiDef png [919 KiB]
Thumbnail [122 KiB] *.C file
Fig8d.pdf
Fig8e.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [276 KiB]
Thumbnail [84 KiB] *.C file
Fig8e.pdf
Fig8f.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [408 KiB]
Thumbnail [87 KiB] *.C file
Fig8f.pdf
Fig8g.pdf [13 KiB]
HiDef png [136 KiB]
Thumbnail [35 KiB] *.C file
Fig8g.pdf

Projections of the data and amplitude fit using the nominal model onto (a) $ m( K ^+ \pi ^- )$, (c) $ m(\eta _ c \pi ^- )$ and (e) $ m(\eta _ c K ^+ )$, with the same projections shown in (b), (d) and (f) with a logarithmic vertical-axis scale. The veto of $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow p \overline p \overline{ D }{} {}^0 $ decays is visible in plot (b). The $ K ^+ \pi ^- $ S-wave component comprises the LASS and $K^*_0(1950)^0$ meson contributions. The components are described in the legend at the bottom.

Fig9a.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [163 KiB]
Thumbnail [56 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [400 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
Fig9b.pdf
Fig9c.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [250 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
Fig9c.pdf
Fig9d.pdf [26 KiB]
HiDef png [624 KiB]
Thumbnail [102 KiB] *.C file
Fig9d.pdf
Fig9e.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [252 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
Fig9e.pdf
Fig9f.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [325 KiB]
Thumbnail [82 KiB] *.C file
Fig9f.pdf
Fig9g.pdf [13 KiB]
HiDef png [129 KiB]
Thumbnail [36 KiB] *.C file
Fig9g.pdf

Comparison of the first four $ K ^+ \pi ^- $ Legendre moments determined from background-subtracted data (black points) and from the results of the amplitude fit using the baseline model (red triangles) and nominal model (blue triangles) as a function of $ m( K ^+ \pi ^- )$.

Fig10a.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [175 KiB]
Thumbnail [57 KiB]
*.C file
Fig10a.pdf
Fig10b.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [186 KiB]
Thumbnail [63 KiB] *.C file
Fig10b.pdf
Fig10c.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [191 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB] *.C file
Fig10c.pdf
Fig10d.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [190 KiB]
Thumbnail [65 KiB] *.C file
Fig10d.pdf

Comparison of the first four $\eta _ c \pi ^- $ Legendre moments determined from background-subtracted data (black points) and from the results of the amplitude fit using the baseline model (red triangles) and nominal model (blue triangles) as a function of $ m(\eta _ c \pi ^- )$.

Fig11a.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [206 KiB]
Thumbnail [67 KiB]
*.C file
Fig11a.pdf
Fig11b.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [213 KiB]
Thumbnail [74 KiB] *.C file
Fig11b.pdf
Fig11c.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [205 KiB]
Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file
Fig11c.pdf
Fig11d.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [202 KiB]
Thumbnail [69 KiB] *.C file
Fig11d.pdf

Comparison of the first four $\eta _ c K ^+ $ Legendre moments determined from background-subtracted data (black points) and from the results of the amplitude fit using the baseline model (red triangles) and nominal model (blue triangles) as a function of $ m(\eta _ c K ^+ )$.

Fig12a.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [206 KiB]
Thumbnail [68 KiB]
*.C file
Fig12a.pdf
Fig12b.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [215 KiB]
Thumbnail [73 KiB] *.C file
Fig12b.pdf
Fig12c.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [212 KiB]
Thumbnail [72 KiB] *.C file
Fig12c.pdf
Fig12d.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [209 KiB]
Thumbnail [71 KiB] *.C file
Fig12d.pdf

2D pull distribution for to the baseline model.

Fig13.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [167 KiB]
Thumbnail [58 KiB]
*.C file
Fig13.pdf

2D pull distribution for to the nominal model.

Fig14.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [167 KiB]
Thumbnail [58 KiB]
*.C file
Fig14.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2018-034.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2018-034.gif

Tables and captions

Relative systematic uncertainties on the ratio $R$ of Eq. \eqref{ratio}. The total systematic uncertainty is obtained from the quadratic sum of the individual sources.

Table_0.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [43 KiB]
Thumbnail [6 KiB]
tex code
Table_0.pdf

Yields of the components in the 2D mass fit to the joint [$ m( p \overline p K ^+ \pi ^- )$, $ m( p \overline p )$] distribution for the Run 1 and 2 subsamples.

Table_1.pdf [53 KiB]
HiDef png [46 KiB]
Thumbnail [7 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Resonances included in the baseline model, where parameters and uncertainties are taken from Ref. \cite{PDG2016}. The LASS lineshape also parametrise the $ K ^+ \pi ^- $ S-wave in $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \eta _ c K ^+ \pi ^- $ NR decays.

Table_2.pdf [52 KiB]
HiDef png [79 KiB]
Thumbnail [12 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Complex coefficients and fit fractions determined from the DP fit using the nominal model. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Table_3.pdf [55 KiB]
HiDef png [89 KiB]
Thumbnail [14 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Significance of the $Z_c(4100)^-$ contribution for the systematic effects producing the largest variations in the parameters of the $Z_c(4100)^-$ candidate. The values obtained in the nominal amplitude fit are shown in the first row.

Table_4.pdf [54 KiB]
HiDef png [59 KiB]
Thumbnail [9 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Rejection level of the $J^P=0^+$ hypothesis with respect to the $J^P=1^-$ hypothesis for the systematic variations producing the largest variations in the parameters of the $Z_c(4100)^-$ candidate. The values obtained in the nominal amplitude fit are shown in the first row.

Table_5.pdf [54 KiB]
HiDef png [56 KiB]
Thumbnail [8 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Fit fractions and their uncertainties. The quoted uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Table_6.pdf [54 KiB]
HiDef png [113 KiB]
Thumbnail [19 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Branching fraction results. The four quoted uncertainties are statistical, $ B ^0 \!\rightarrow \eta _ c K ^+ \pi ^- $ branching fraction systematic (not including the contribution from the uncertainty associated to the efficiency ratio, to avoid double counting the systematic uncertainty associated to the evaluation of the efficiencies), fit fraction systematic and external branching fractions uncertainties, respectively.

Table_7.pdf [55 KiB]
HiDef png [78 KiB]
Thumbnail [12 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Created on 09 December 2018.Citation count from INSPIRE on 09 December 2018.