cern.ch

Search for time-dependent $CP$ violation in $D^0 \to K^+ K^-$ and $D^0 \to \pi^+ \pi^-$ decays

[to restricted-access page]

Abstract

A search for charge-parity ( $ C P$ ) violation in the time-dependent decay rates of $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ and $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ decays is reported. The data correspond to an integrated luminosity of $1.9\text{ fb} ^{-1} $ collected by the LHCb detector in 2015--2016 in $ p $ $ p $ collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $13\text{ Te V} $. The flavour of the $ D ^0$ meson is inferred from the charge of the pion in $ D ^{*}(2010)^{+} \rightarrow D ^0 \pi ^+ $ decays. The asymmetries of the time-dependent decay rates of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ decays, sensitive to $ C P$ violation in the mixing and in the interference between mixing and decay, are measured to be $ A_{\Gamma} ( K ^+ K ^- ) = (1.3 \pm 3.5 \pm 0.7)\times 10^{-4}$ and $ A_{\Gamma} (\pi ^+ \pi ^- ) = (11.3 \pm 6.9 \pm 0.8)\times 10^{-4}$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic.

Figures and captions

Distributions of $\Delta m$ for the (a) $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ , (b) $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ and (c) $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ samples. The signal region and the region used for the sideband subtraction to remove the combinatorial background (red filled area) are delimited by the vertical dashed lines.

Fig1a.pdf [32 KiB]
HiDef png [170 KiB]
Thumbnail [170 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [32 KiB]
HiDef png [172 KiB]
Thumbnail [171 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1b.pdf
Fig1c.pdf [32 KiB]
HiDef png [172 KiB]
Thumbnail [174 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1c.pdf

(Left) sum and (right) asymmetry of the distributions of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates, in (top) $ q_\text{tag} \theta_x$ versus $k$ and (bottom) $ q_\text{tag} \theta_x$ versus $\theta_y$ planes, for the 2016 Mag Up $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ subsample. The angle $\theta_{x(y)} \equiv \arctan(p_{x(y)} / p_z)$ is the emission angle of the $ D ^0$ in the bending (vertical) plane, $k \equiv 1/\sqrt{p_x^2 + p_z^2}$ and $ q_\text{tag}$ is the sign of the charge of the tagging pion.

Fig2a.pdf [46 KiB]
HiDef png [841 KiB]
Thumbnail [550 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2a.pdf
Fig2b.pdf [48 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [649 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2b.pdf
Fig2c.pdf [59 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [627 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2c.pdf
Fig2d.pdf [65 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [765 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2d.pdf

Fit to the time-dependent asymmetry of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ sample (red) before the kinematic weighting of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates and the subtraction of secondary decays, but with a cut $\lvert\text{TIP}\rvert < 40 \upmu\text{m} $ to reduce their amount, and (black) after the kinematic weighting and the subtraction of secondary decays, for the (left) 2016 Mag Up and (right) 2016 MagDown subsamples.

Fig3a.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [257 KiB]
Thumbnail [248 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3a.pdf
Fig3b.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [257 KiB]
Thumbnail [244 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3b.pdf

Transverse IP distributions of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ 2016 Mag Up subsample for the $(a)$ first, $(b)$ middle and $(c)$ last time bin. The results of the fit are superimposed.

Fig4a.pdf [25 KiB]
HiDef png [274 KiB]
Thumbnail [248 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4a.pdf
Fig4b.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [321 KiB]
Thumbnail [267 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4b.pdf
Fig4c.pdf [28 KiB]
HiDef png [275 KiB]
Thumbnail [233 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4c.pdf

Fraction of secondary decays fitted to the TIP distribution (within the $\lvert \text{TIP} \rvert < 200 \upmu\text{m} $ range) as a function of decay time, for the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ 2016 Mag Up subsample. Black dots are the fractions of secondary decays returned by the baseline fit model, whereas other points correspond to alternative models used to assess systematic uncertainties on the measurement of $ A_{\Gamma}$ . Splines are drawn through the points.

Fig5.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [200 KiB]
Thumbnail [161 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5.pdf

Results of the fits to the time-dependent asymmetry for each subsample, including their weighted average, labelled "avg.". In the labels, 2015 (2016) is abbreviated as 15 (16) and Mag Up ( MagDown ) is abbreviated as Up (Dw). Numerical values and fit qualities ( $\chi^2/\mathrm{ndf}$ ) are reported on the right of each plot. Solid red squares correspond to asymmetries measured before the kinematic weighting of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates and without the subtraction of secondary decays, which are suppressed with a cut $\lvert \text{TIP} \rvert < 40 \upmu\text{m} $ instead. Empty black dots correspond to asymmetries measured after the kinematic weighting and disentangling the asymmetry of primary decays in the fit to the TIP distributions in the $\lvert \text{TIP} \rvert < 200 \upmu\text{m} $ range.

Fig6a.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [283 KiB]
Thumbnail [228 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [279 KiB]
Thumbnail [225 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6b.pdf
Fig6c.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [290 KiB]
Thumbnail [234 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6c.pdf

Measured asymmetry of the primary decays in bins of $t/\tau_{ D ^0 } $, where $\tau_{ D ^0 } = 0.410\text{ ps} $ [33], for (top) the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ , (centre) $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ and (bottom) $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ decay channels, averaged over the full 2015--2016 data sample. The solid lines show the linear fit, whose slope is equal to $- A_{\Gamma} $.

Fig7a.pdf [16 KiB]
HiDef png [108 KiB]
Thumbnail [101 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7a.pdf
Fig7b.pdf [16 KiB]
HiDef png [93 KiB]
Thumbnail [90 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7b.pdf
Fig7c.pdf [16 KiB]
HiDef png [107 KiB]
Thumbnail [101 KiB]
*.C file
Fig7c.pdf

Template fit to the $m( h ^+ h ^- )$ distribution for the (left) $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ and (right) $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ samples after the $\Delta m$ sideband subtraction. The vertical dashed lines delimit the signal region. The $m( h ^+ h ^- )$ template of the $ D ^+_ s \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- \pi ^+ $ decay has a negative contribution to the left of the known $ D ^0$ mass due to the sideband subtraction. For $ D ^+_ s \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- \pi ^+ $ decays, $m( h ^+ h ^- )$ is nearly linearly correlated with $\Delta m$ .

Fig8a.pdf [27 KiB]
HiDef png [392 KiB]
Thumbnail [329 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8a.pdf
Fig8b.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [347 KiB]
Thumbnail [306 KiB]
*.C file
Fig8b.pdf

(Left) sum and (right) asymmetry of the distributions of the tagging pion of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates, in (top) $ q_\text{tag} \theta_x$ versus $k$ and (bottom) $ q_\text{tag} \theta_x$ versus $\theta_y$ planes, for the 2016 Mag Up $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ subsample. The angle $\theta_{x(y)} \equiv \arctan(p_{x(y)} / p_z)$ is the emission angle of the $\pi ^{+}_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle tag}}$ in the bending (vertical) plane, $k \equiv 1/\sqrt{p_x^2 + p_z^2}$ is proportional to the curvature of the $\pi ^{+}_{\mathrm{ \scriptscriptstyle tag}}$ , and $ q_\text{tag}$ is the sign of its charge.

Fig9a.pdf [46 KiB]
HiDef png [801 KiB]
Thumbnail [519 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [49 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [629 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9b.pdf
Fig9c.pdf [60 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [641 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9c.pdf
Fig9d.pdf [66 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [779 KiB]
*.C file
Fig9d.pdf

Normalised distribution and asymmetry of the $ D ^0$ transverse momentum for (left) the 2016 Mag Up and (right) 2016 MagDown sample, for the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ decay mode.

Fig10a.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [259 KiB]
Thumbnail [256 KiB]
*.C file
Fig10a.pdf
Fig10b.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [262 KiB]
Thumbnail [254 KiB]
*.C file
Fig10b.pdf

Normalised distributions of the measured transverse momentum of the $ D ^0$ in all bins of decay time.

Fig11a.pdf [122 KiB]
HiDef png [1 MiB]
Thumbnail [460 KiB]
*.C file
Fig11a.pdf
Fig11b.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [269 KiB]
Thumbnail [250 KiB]
*.C file
Fig11b.pdf

Effect of the kinematic weighting on the measured value of $ A_{\Gamma}$ . The measured value corresponds to $(87.7 \pm 0.8)\%$ of the artificial value injected in the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ sample.

Fig12.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [180 KiB]
Thumbnail [187 KiB]
*.C file
Fig12.pdf

Transverse IP distributions of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ 2016 Mag Up subsample for the (left) first, (centre) middle and (right) last time bin. The results of the fit are superimposed.

Fig13a.pdf [27 KiB]
HiDef png [297 KiB]
Thumbnail [264 KiB]
*.C file
Fig13a.pdf
Fig13b.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [304 KiB]
Thumbnail [254 KiB]
*.C file
Fig13b.pdf
Fig13c.pdf [28 KiB]
HiDef png [246 KiB]
Thumbnail [225 KiB]
*.C file
Fig13c.pdf

Transverse IP distributions of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ 2016 Mag Up subsample for the (left) first, (centre) middle and (right) last time bin. The results of the fit are superimposed.

Fig14a.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [269 KiB]
Thumbnail [245 KiB]
*.C file
Fig14a.pdf
Fig14b.pdf [27 KiB]
HiDef png [307 KiB]
Thumbnail [272 KiB]
*.C file
Fig14b.pdf
Fig14c.pdf [28 KiB]
HiDef png [327 KiB]
Thumbnail [274 KiB]
*.C file
Fig14c.pdf

Fit to the time-dependent asymmetry of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^- \pi ^+ $ sample (red) before the kinematic weighting of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates and the subtraction of secondary decays, but with a cut $\lvert\text{TIP}\rvert < 40 \upmu\text{m} $ to reduce their amount, and (black) after the kinematic weighting and the subtraction of secondary decays. The figures correspond to the (top) 2015 and (bottom) 2016 subsamples, and to the (left) Mag Up and (right) 2016 MagDown subsamples.

Fig15a.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [261 KiB]
Thumbnail [259 KiB]
*.C file
Fig15a.pdf
Fig15b.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [266 KiB]
Thumbnail [260 KiB]
*.C file
Fig15b.pdf
Fig15c.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [257 KiB]
Thumbnail [248 KiB]
*.C file
Fig15c.pdf
Fig15d.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [257 KiB]
Thumbnail [244 KiB]
*.C file
Fig15d.pdf

Fit to the time-dependent asymmetry of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ sample (red) before the kinematic weighting of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates and the subtraction of secondary decays, but with a cut $\lvert\text{TIP}\rvert < 40 \upmu\text{m} $ to reduce their amount, and (black) after the kinematic weighting and the subtraction of secondary decays. The figures correspond to the (top) 2015 and (bottom) 2016 subsamples, and to the (left) Mag Up and (right) 2016 MagDown subsamples.

Fig16a.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [249 KiB]
Thumbnail [234 KiB]
*.C file
Fig16a.pdf
Fig16b.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [252 KiB]
Thumbnail [229 KiB]
*.C file
Fig16b.pdf
Fig16c.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [244 KiB]
Thumbnail [226 KiB]
*.C file
Fig16c.pdf
Fig16d.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [245 KiB]
Thumbnail [213 KiB]
*.C file
Fig16d.pdf

Fit to the time-dependent asymmetry of the $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ sample (red) before the kinematic weighting of $ D ^0$ and $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ candidates and the subtraction of secondary decays, but with a cut $\lvert\text{TIP}\rvert < 40 \upmu\text{m} $ to reduce their amount, and (black) after the kinematic weighting and the subtraction of secondary decays. The figures correspond to the (top) 2015 and (bottom) 2016 subsamples, and to the (left) Mag Up and (right) 2016 MagDown subsamples.

Fig17a.pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [260 KiB]
Thumbnail [238 KiB]
*.C file
Fig17a.pdf
Fig17b.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [260 KiB]
Thumbnail [233 KiB]
*.C file
Fig17b.pdf
Fig17c.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [247 KiB]
Thumbnail [232 KiB]
*.C file
Fig17c.pdf
Fig17d.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [250 KiB]
Thumbnail [223 KiB]
*.C file
Fig17d.pdf

Template fit to the $m( h ^+ h ^- )$ distribution for the (top) $ D ^0 \rightarrow K ^+ K ^- $ and (bottom) $ D ^0 \rightarrow \pi ^+ \pi ^- $ samples. The vertical dashed lines delimit the signal region.

Fig18a.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [274 KiB]
Thumbnail [256 KiB]
*.C file
Fig18a.pdf
Fig18b.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [254 KiB]
Thumbnail [238 KiB]
*.C file
Fig18b.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

CONF-2019-001.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_CONF-2019-001.gif

Tables and captions

Systematic uncertainties on the measurement of $ A_{\Gamma}$ , in units of $10^{-4}$.

Table_1.pdf [46 KiB]
HiDef png [51 KiB]
Thumbnail [26 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Created on 24 August 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 24 August 2019.