cern.ch

Measurements of charm mixing and $C P$ violation using $D^0 \to K^\pm \pi^\mp$ decays

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Contact

Abstract

Measurements of charm mixing and $C P$ violation parameters from the decay-time-dependent ratio of $ D^0 \to K^+ \pi^- $ to $ D^0 \to K^- \pi^+ $ decay rates and the charge-conjugate ratio are reported. The analysis uses $\overline{B}\to D^{*+} \mu^- X$, and charge-conjugate decays, where $D^{*+}\to D^0 \pi^+$, and $D^0\to K^{\mp} \pi^{\pm}$. The $pp$ collision data are recorded by the LHCb experiment at center-of-mass energies $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 and 8 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3 fb$^{-1}$. The data are analyzed under three hypotheses: (i) mixing assuming $C P$ symmetry, (ii) mixing assuming no direct $C P$ violation in the Cabibbo-favored or doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decay amplitudes, and (iii) mixing allowing either direct $C P$ violation and/or $C P$ violation in the superpositions of flavor eigenstates defining the mass eigenstates. The data are also combined with those from a previous LHCb study of $D^0\to K \pi$ decays from a disjoint set of $ D^{*+} $ candidates produced directly in $pp$ collisions. In all cases, the data are consistent with the hypothesis of $C P$ symmetry.

Figures and captions

The time-integrated $ D ^0 \pi^+_s$ invariant mass distributions, after same-sign subtraction, for (a) RS decays and (b) WS decays. Fit projections are overlaid. Below each plot are the normalized residual distributions.

Fig1a.pdf [82 KiB]
HiDef png [285 KiB]
Thumbnail [266 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [80 KiB]
HiDef png [273 KiB]
Thumbnail [257 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1b.pdf

Efficiency corrected and SS background subtracted ratios of WS/RS decays and fit projections for the DT sample. The top plot shows the $ D ^0$ $(R^+(t))$ sample. The middle plot shows the $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ $(R^-(t))$ sample. The bottom plot shows the difference between the top and middle plots. In all cases, the error bars superposed on the data points are those from the $ \chi^2 $ minimization fits with no accounting for additional systematic uncertainties. The projections shown are for fits assuming $ C P$ symmetry (solid blue line), allowing no direct $CPV$ (dashed-dotted green line), and allowing all forms of $CPV$ (dashed magenta line). Bins are centered at the average value of $t/\tau$ of the bin.

Fig2.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [383 KiB]
Thumbnail [361 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2.pdf

Efficiency-corrected data and fit projections for the DT (red open circles) and prompt (black filled circles) samples. The top plot shows the $ D ^0$ $(R^+(t))$ samples. The middle plot shows the $\overline{ D }{} {}^0$ $(R^-(t))$ samples. The bottom plot shows the difference between the top and middle plots. In all cases, the error bars superposed on the data points are those from the $ \chi^2 $ minimization fits without accounting for additional systematic uncertainties. The projections shown are for fits assuming $ C P$ symmetry (solid blue line), allowing no direct $CPV$ (dashed-dotted green line), and allowing all forms of $CPV$ (dashed magenta line). Bins are centered at the average $t/\tau$ of the bin.

Fig3.pdf [24 KiB]
HiDef png [408 KiB]
Thumbnail [354 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2016-033.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2016-033.gif

Tables and captions

Summary of systematic uncertainties for the DT analysis for each of the three fits described in the text.

Table_1.pdf [51 KiB]
HiDef png [132 KiB]
Thumbnail [56 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Fitted parameters of the DT sample. The first uncertainties include the statistical uncertainty, as well as the peaking backgrounds and the $K\pi$ detection efficiency, and the second are systematic.

Table_2.pdf [53 KiB]
HiDef png [398 KiB]
Thumbnail [182 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Simultaneous fit result of the DT and prompt samples. The prompt-only results from [1] are shown on the right for comparison. Statistical and systematic errors have been added in quadrature.

Table_3.pdf [55 KiB]
HiDef png [307 KiB]
Thumbnail [154 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Systematic uncertainties for the simultaneous fits of the DT and prompt datasets.

Table_4.pdf [50 KiB]
HiDef png [132 KiB]
Thumbnail [57 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Correlation matrix for the no $CPV$ fit to the DT data.

Table_5.pdf [45 KiB]
HiDef png [52 KiB]
Thumbnail [21 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Correlation matrix for the no direct $CPV$ fit to the DT data.

Table_6.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [55 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Correlation matrix for the all $CPV$ allowed fit to the DT data.

Table_7.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [12 KiB]
Thumbnail [26 KiB]
tex code
Table_7.pdf

Correlation matrix for the no $CPV$ simultaneous fit to the prompt + DT data sets.

Table_8.pdf [46 KiB]
HiDef png [55 KiB]
Thumbnail [22 KiB]
tex code
Table_8.pdf

Correlation matrix for the no direct $CPV$ simultaneous fit to the prompt + DT data sets.

Table_9.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [55 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_9.pdf

Correlation matrix for the all $CPV$ allowed simultaneous fit to the prompt + DT data sets.

Table_10.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [12 KiB]
Thumbnail [27 KiB]
tex code
Table_10.pdf

Supplementary Material [file]

Supplementary material full pdf

supple[..].pdf [1 MiB]
supplementary.pdf

This ZIP file contains supplemetary material for the publication LHCb-PAPER-2016-033. The files are: supplementary.pdf : An overview of the extra figures *.pdf, *.png, *.eps : The figures in various formats

fig_supp_1.pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [82 KiB]
Thumbnail [91 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_1.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [155 KiB]
Thumbnail [160 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_2a.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [197 KiB]
Thumbnail [156 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_2b.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [214 KiB]
Thumbnail [168 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_2c.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [15 KiB]
HiDef png [160 KiB]
Thumbnail [167 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_3a.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [216 KiB]
Thumbnail [170 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_3b.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [14 KiB]
HiDef png [181 KiB]
Thumbnail [137 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_3c.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [54 KiB]
HiDef png [222 KiB]
Thumbnail [188 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_4a.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [56 KiB]
HiDef png [206 KiB]
Thumbnail [171 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_4a_logy.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [51 KiB]
HiDef png [205 KiB]
Thumbnail [181 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_4b.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [51 KiB]
HiDef png [259 KiB]
Thumbnail [205 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_4b_logy.pdf
fig_supp_5.pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [307 KiB]
Thumbnail [227 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_5.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [311 KiB]
Thumbnail [206 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_5_logy.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [312 KiB]
Thumbnail [220 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6a.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [370 KiB]
Thumbnail [230 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6a_logy.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [310 KiB]
Thumbnail [220 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6b.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [363 KiB]
Thumbnail [234 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6b_logy.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [311 KiB]
Thumbnail [225 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6c.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [378 KiB]
Thumbnail [243 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6c_logy.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [309 KiB]
Thumbnail [220 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6d.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [378 KiB]
Thumbnail [234 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6d_logy.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [19 KiB]
HiDef png [321 KiB]
Thumbnail [232 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6e.pdf
fig_su[..].pdf [18 KiB]
HiDef png [365 KiB]
Thumbnail [215 KiB]
*C file
fig_supp_6e_logy.pdf

Created on 24 August 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 24 August 2019.