Decays of $B_{s}^{0}$ and $\overline{B}{}_{s}^{0}$ mesons into $J/\psi\pi^+\pi^$ final states are studied in a data sample corresponding to 1.9 fb$^{1}$ of integrated luminosity collected with the LHCb detector in 13 TeV $pp$ collisions. A timedependent amplitude analysis is used to determine the finalstate resonance contributions, the $CP$violating phase $\phi_s=0.057\pm 0.060\pm 0.011$ rad, the decaywidth difference between the heavier mass $B_{s}^{0}$ eigenstate and the $B^{0}$ meson of $0.050\pm 0.004\pm 0.004$ ps$^{1}$, and the $CP$violating parameter $\lambda=1.01_{0.06}^{+0.08}\pm0.03$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. These results are combined with previous LHCb measurements in the same decay channel using 7 TeV and 8 TeV $pp$ collisions obtaining $\phi_s =0.002\pm0.044\pm0.012$ rad, and $\lambda =0.949\pm0.036\pm0.019$.
Results of the simultaneous fit to the $ { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \pi\pi$ mass distributions RS (black points) and WS (grey points) samples. The solid (blue) curve shows the fit to the RS sample, the long dashed (red) curve shows the signal, the dotdashed (magenta) curve shows $ B ^0 \rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \pi ^+ \pi ^ $ decays, the dotlongdashed (brown) curve shows the combinatorial background, the dotted (black) curve shows the sum of $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \eta^\prime$ and $\Lambda ^0_ b $ background, while the dotdotdashed (green) curve shows the fit to WS sample. 
Fig1.pdf [31 KiB] HiDef png [392 KiB] Thumbnail [277 KiB] *.C file 

Overall efficiency normalized to unity for (a) $m_{\pi\pi}$ , (b) $\cos \theta_{\pi\pi}$ , (c) $\cos \theta_{ { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} }$ and (d) $\chi$ observables. The points with error bars are from the $ B ^0_ s \rightarrow { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \pi ^+ \pi ^ $ simulation, while the curves show the projection of the efficiency function. 
Fig2a.pdf [19 KiB] HiDef png [149 KiB] Thumbnail [146 KiB] *.C file 

Fig2b.pdf [16 KiB] HiDef png [140 KiB] Thumbnail [135 KiB] *.C file 

Fig2c.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [130 KiB] Thumbnail [127 KiB] *.C file 

Fig2d.pdf [17 KiB] HiDef png [126 KiB] Thumbnail [119 KiB] *.C file 

Overall efficiency for (a) $m_{\pi\pi}$ vs $\cos \theta_{\pi\pi}$ and (b) $m^2_{ { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \pi ^+ }$ vs $m^2_{\pi\pi}$. The inefficiency is at the kinematic boundary of $m^2_{ { J \mskip 3mu/\mskip 2mu\psi \mskip 2mu} \pi^+}$ where the pion is almost at rest in the $ B ^0_ s $ frame. 
Fig3a.pdf [226 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [664 KiB] *.C file 

Fig3b.pdf [312 KiB] HiDef png [1 MiB] Thumbnail [451 KiB] *.C file 

Projections of the angular and decaytime variables with the fit result overlaid. The points (black) show the data and the curves (blue) the fits. 
Fig4a.pdf [20 KiB] HiDef png [133 KiB] Thumbnail [125 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4b.pdf [18 KiB] HiDef png [145 KiB] Thumbnail [134 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4c.pdf [20 KiB] HiDef png [122 KiB] Thumbnail [115 KiB] *.C file 

Fig4d.pdf [20 KiB] HiDef png [132 KiB] Thumbnail [127 KiB] *.C file 

Data distribution of $m_{\pi\pi}$ with the projection of the Solution I fit result overlaid. The data are described by the points (black) with error bars. The solid (blue) curve shows the overall fit. 
Fig5.pdf [29 KiB] HiDef png [324 KiB] Thumbnail [256 KiB] *.C file 

Animated gif made out of all figures. 
PAPER2019003.gif Thumbnail 
Tagging efficiency, $\varepsilon_{\rm tag}$, and tagging power given as the efficiency times dilution squared, $\varepsilon_{\rm tag}D^2$, where $D=(12\omega)$ for each category and the total. The uncertainties on $\varepsilon_{\rm tag}$ are statistical only, and those for $\varepsilon_{\rm tag}D^2$ contain both statistical and systematic components. 
Table_1.pdf [38 KiB] HiDef png [103 KiB] Thumbnail [47 KiB] tex code 

Resonance parameters. 
Table_2.pdf [54 KiB] HiDef png [113 KiB] Thumbnail [57 KiB] tex code 

Likelihoods of various resonance model fits. Positive or negative interferences (Int) among the contributing resonances are indicated. The Solutions are indicated by \#. 
Table_3.pdf [43 KiB] HiDef png [81 KiB] Thumbnail [41 KiB] tex code 

Fit results for the $ C P$ violating parameters for Solution I. The first uncertainties are statistical, and the second systematic. The last three columns show the statistical correlation coefficients for the three parameters. 
Table_4.pdf [59 KiB] HiDef png [45 KiB] Thumbnail [24 KiB] tex code 

Fit results of the resonant structure for both Solutions I and II. These results do not supersede those in Ref. [27] for the resonant fractions because no systematic uncertainties are quoted. The sum of fit fraction is not necessary 100% due to possible interferences between resonances with the same spin. 
Table_5.pdf [46 KiB] HiDef png [142 KiB] Thumbnail [76 KiB] tex code 

Absolute systematic uncertainties for the physics parameters. 
Table_6.pdf [65 KiB] HiDef png [137 KiB] Thumbnail [69 KiB] tex code 
Created on 17 August 2019.Citation count from INSPIRE on 17 August 2019.