cern.ch

Search for the doubly charmed baryon $\Xi_{cc}^{+}$

[to restricted-access page]

Information

Tools

Abstract

A search for the doubly charmed baryon $\Xi_{cc}^{+}$ is performed through its decay to the $\Lambda_c^+ K^- \pi^+$ final state, using proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13$\mathrm{ Te V}$. The data correspond to a total integrated luminosity of $9 \mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. No significant signal is observed in the mass range from 3.4 to 3.8$\mathrm{ Ge V}/c^2$. Upper limits are set at $95\%$ credibility level on the ratio of the $\Xi_{cc}^{+}$ production cross-section times the branching fraction to that of $\Lambda_c^+$ and $\Xi_{cc}^{++}$ baryons. The limits are determined as functions of the $\Xi_{cc}^{+}$ mass for different lifetime hypotheses, in the rapidity range from 2.0 to 4.5 and the transverse momentum range from 4 to 15$\mathrm{ Ge V}/c$.

Figures and captions

Mass distributions of the (left) intermediate $\Lambda ^+_ c $ and (right) $\Xi _{ c c }^{+}$ candidates for the full data sample. Selection A is applied, including the $\Lambda ^+_ c $ mass requirement, indicated by the cross-hatched region in the left plot, of $2270\text{ Me V /}c^2 <M([ p K ^- \pi ^+ ]_{\Lambda ^+_ c })<2306\text{ Me V /}c^2 $. The right-sign (RS) $m(\Lambda ^+_ c K ^- \pi ^+ )$ distribution is shown in the right plot, along with the wrong-sign (WS) $m(\Lambda ^+_ c K ^- \pi ^- )$ distribution normalised to have the same area. The dotted red line at 3518.7 $\text{ Me V /}c^2$ indicates the mass of the $\Xi _{ c c }^{+}$ baryon reported by SELEX [42] and the dashed blue line at 3621.2 $\text{ Me V /}c^2$ indicates the mass of the isospin partner, the $\Xi _{ c c }^{++}$ baryon [48].

Fig1a.pdf [16 KiB]
HiDef png [402 KiB]
Thumbnail [195 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1a.pdf
Fig1b.pdf [20 KiB]
HiDef png [174 KiB]
Thumbnail [151 KiB]
*.C file
Fig1b.pdf

Local $p$-value (statistical only) at different $\Xi _{ c c }^{+} $ mass values evaluated with the likelihood-ratio test, for the data sets recorded at $\sqrt{s}=7\text{ Te V} $, $\sqrt{s}=8\text{ Te V} $ and $\sqrt{s}=13\text{ Te V} $. Selection A is applied, including the $\Lambda ^+_ c $ mass requirement of $2270\text{ Me V /}c^2 <M([ p K ^- \pi ^+ ]_{\Lambda ^+_ c })<2306\text{ Me V /}c^2 $.

Fig2.pdf [17 KiB]
HiDef png [270 KiB]
Thumbnail [210 KiB]
*.C file
Fig2.pdf

Distributions of (left) $M([ p K ^- \pi ^+ ]_{\Lambda ^+_ c })$ and (right) $\log_{10}(\chi^2_{\text{IP}} )$ of the selected $\Lambda ^+_ c $ candidates with associated fit results for the 2018 data set.

Fig3a.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [251 KiB]
Thumbnail [192 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3a.pdf
Fig3b.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [287 KiB]
Thumbnail [200 KiB]
*.C file
Fig3b.pdf

Mass distribution of $\Xi _{ c c }^{++} $ candidates in the 2018 data set. The result of a fit to the distribution is shown.

Fig4.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [622 KiB]
Thumbnail [508 KiB]
*.C file
Fig4.pdf

Upper limits on (left) $\mathcal{R}(\Lambda ^+_ c )$ and (right) $\mathcal{R}(\Xi _{ c c }^{++} )$ at 95% credibility level as a function of $m(\Lambda ^+_ c K ^- \pi ^+ )$ at $\sqrt{s}=8\text{ Te V} $ for four $\Xi _{ c c }^{+} $ lifetime hypotheses.

Fig5a.pdf [44 KiB]
HiDef png [307 KiB]
Thumbnail [216 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5a.pdf
Fig5b.pdf [44 KiB]
HiDef png [299 KiB]
Thumbnail [204 KiB]
*.C file
Fig5b.pdf

Upper limits on (left) $\mathcal{R}(\Lambda ^+_ c )$ (right) $\mathcal{R}(\Xi _{ c c }^{++} )$ at 95% credibility level as a function of $m(\Lambda ^+_ c K ^- \pi ^+ )$ at $\sqrt{s}=13\text{ Te V} $, for four $\Xi _{ c c }^{+} $ lifetime hypotheses.

Fig6a.pdf [44 KiB]
HiDef png [337 KiB]
Thumbnail [229 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6a.pdf
Fig6b.pdf [44 KiB]
HiDef png [326 KiB]
Thumbnail [220 KiB]
*.C file
Fig6b.pdf

Animated gif made out of all figures.

PAPER-2019-029.gif
Thumbnail
thumbnail_PAPER-2019-029.gif

Tables and captions

Signal yields for prompt $\Lambda ^+_ c \rightarrow p K ^- \pi ^+ $ and $\Xi _{ c c }^{++} \rightarrow \Lambda ^+_ c K ^- \pi ^+ \pi ^+ $ normalisation modes, split by data-taking period. The integrated luminosity $\mathcal{L}$ is also shown for each data-taking period.

Table_1.pdf [50 KiB]
HiDef png [67 KiB]
Thumbnail [34 KiB]
tex code
Table_1.pdf

Efficiency ratios between the normalisation and signal modes for different data-taking periods. The uncertainties are due to the limited size of the simulated samples.

Table_2.pdf [42 KiB]
HiDef png [31 KiB]
Thumbnail [17 KiB]
tex code
Table_2.pdf

Single-event sensitivity of the $\Lambda ^+_ c $ normalisation mode $\alpha(\Lambda ^+_ c )$ [$\times 10^{-5}$] for different lifetime hypotheses of the $\Xi _{ c c }^{+} $ baryon in the different data-taking years. The uncertainties are due to the limited sizes of the simulated samples and the statistical uncertainties on the measured $\Lambda ^+_ c $ baryon yields.

Table_3.pdf [26 KiB]
HiDef png [64 KiB]
Thumbnail [35 KiB]
tex code
Table_3.pdf

Single-event sensitivity of the $\Xi _{ c c }^{++}$ normalisation mode $\alpha(\Xi _{ c c }^{++} )$ [$\times 10^{-2}$] for different lifetime hypotheses of the $\Xi _{ c c }^{+} $ baryon in the different data-taking years. The uncertainties are due to the limited size of the simulated samples and the statistical uncertainty on the measured $\Xi _{ c c }^{++}$ baryon yield.

Table_4.pdf [26 KiB]
HiDef png [63 KiB]
Thumbnail [35 KiB]
tex code
Table_4.pdf

Summary of the systematic uncertainties of the production ratio measurement.

Table_5.pdf [47 KiB]
HiDef png [89 KiB]
Thumbnail [43 KiB]
tex code
Table_5.pdf

Summary of the largest upper limits on production ratios at 95% credibility level for four lifetime hypotheses and different centre-of-mass energies.

Table_6.pdf [50 KiB]
HiDef png [50 KiB]
Thumbnail [26 KiB]
tex code
Table_6.pdf

Supplementary Material [file]

Supplementary material full pdf

supple[..].pdf [428 KiB]
supplementary.pdf

This ZIP file contains supplemetary material for the publication LHCb-PAPER-2019-019. The files are: Supplementary.pdf : An overview of the extra figures *.pdf, *.png, *.eps : The figures in variuous formats

Fig10a.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [472 KiB]
Thumbnail [369 KiB]
*C file
Fig10a.pdf
Fig10b.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [574 KiB]
Thumbnail [465 KiB]
*C file
Fig10b.pdf
Fig10c.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [585 KiB]
Thumbnail [475 KiB]
*C file
Fig10c.pdf
Fig10d.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [622 KiB]
Thumbnail [508 KiB]
*C file
Fig10d.pdf
Fig7.pdf [22 KiB]
HiDef png [728 KiB]
Thumbnail [573 KiB]
*C file
Fig7.pdf
Fig8.pdf [27 KiB]
HiDef png [217 KiB]
Thumbnail [201 KiB]
*C file
Fig8.pdf
Fig9a.pdf [28 KiB]
HiDef png [277 KiB]
Thumbnail [205 KiB]
*C file
Fig9a.pdf
Fig9b.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [332 KiB]
Thumbnail [223 KiB]
*C file
Fig9b.pdf
Fig9c.pdf [28 KiB]
HiDef png [242 KiB]
Thumbnail [175 KiB]
*C file
Fig9c.pdf
Fig9d.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [287 KiB]
Thumbnail [205 KiB]
*C file
Fig9d.pdf
Fig9e.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [238 KiB]
Thumbnail [176 KiB]
*C file
Fig9e.pdf
Fig9f.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [294 KiB]
Thumbnail [217 KiB]
*C file
Fig9f.pdf
Fig9g.pdf [29 KiB]
HiDef png [247 KiB]
Thumbnail [186 KiB]
*C file
Fig9g.pdf
Fig9h.pdf [23 KiB]
HiDef png [280 KiB]
Thumbnail [192 KiB]
*C file
Fig9h.pdf

Created on 07 December 2019.